2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2004.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A catastrophic failure of a first MTP joint ceramic implant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study has the longest follow-up of all studies with this prosthesis to date ( Table 2). Previous studies with this prosthesis have included 13 case series (Table 2), 2,3,6,8,11,12,15,17,21,23,26,27,29 2 abstracts, 10,19 and 2 case reports, 13,28 and 3 previous studies have evaluated the outcome of revision procedures 32,33 or lesser toe replacement surgery 34 with this type of prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study has the longest follow-up of all studies with this prosthesis to date ( Table 2). Previous studies with this prosthesis have included 13 case series (Table 2), 2,3,6,8,11,12,15,17,21,23,26,27,29 2 abstracts, 10,19 and 2 case reports, 13,28 and 3 previous studies have evaluated the outcome of revision procedures 32,33 or lesser toe replacement surgery 34 with this type of prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malviya et al (18) showed positive results with this new Moje system, in a 35-month follow-up study. However, other studies report cases of failure of the Moje ® press-fit prosthesis, due to problems with the materials used (zirconium ceramic) (9) . In 2007, Nixon and Taylor (2) published the results of a study involving 21 prostheses, in which they found an unacceptable failure rate of around 29% requiring surgical revision and a complication rate of 71% within three years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these prostheses presented several complications, including fracture of the prosthesis and synovitis and bone lysis related to worn particles of silicone 5 , 6 , 7 . In 1994, the use of zirconium ceramic components (Moje ® ) was tested, but these materials also presented several complications, particularly due to fracture of the material 2 , 8 , 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 However, a number of these implants have already fallen into disrepute due to unacceptable failure or complication rates, notably in silicone, titanium and polyethylene. 5,7,11,13,16 The continuing effort to design a successful joint replacement for the first MTPJ, led to the development and introduction of the MOJE ceramic-on-ceramic (uncemented) pressfit prosthesis to the UK market in early 2000 (Figure 1). This new press-fit design replaced the original screw-fit titanium and ceramic MOJE prosthesis, which was withdrawn in the UK in 2000 due to a Medical Devices Agency alert, following reports of unacceptably high failure rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%