1976
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90450-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A caution to brain scientists: unsuspected hemorrhagic vascular damage resulting from mere electrode implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, however, would significantly increase the effort associated with such experiments and may also affect the outcome of drug experiments, because chronic seizure monitoring is associated with distress and discomfort, particularly in mice. Furthermore, implantation of EEG electrodes in rodents (and patients) is known to be associated with brain alterations, including inflammation, hemorrhage, blood–brain barrier dysfunction, and neuronal dysfunction . Substantial inflammation and compromised blood–brain barrier occur even in response to bone screw electrodes that do not penetrate into the brain .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, would significantly increase the effort associated with such experiments and may also affect the outcome of drug experiments, because chronic seizure monitoring is associated with distress and discomfort, particularly in mice. Furthermore, implantation of EEG electrodes in rodents (and patients) is known to be associated with brain alterations, including inflammation, hemorrhage, blood–brain barrier dysfunction, and neuronal dysfunction . Substantial inflammation and compromised blood–brain barrier occur even in response to bone screw electrodes that do not penetrate into the brain .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age (Dube et al, 2001; Priel et al, 1996; Sankar et al, 1997), strain (Xu et al, 2004), pilocarpine dose (Cavalheiro et al, 1987; Priel et al, 1996), presence of lithium (Clifford et al, 1987), electrode implantation techniques (Boast et al, 1976; Loscher et al, 1995), attenuation of SE with benzodiazepine (Hasson et al, 2008) or paraldehyde (Kubova et al, 2005), as well as both timing and type of injury assessment have all been postulated to affect the degree of detectable neuronal loss. Table 2 summarizes some of the parameters used previously to assess for neuronal damage outside the hippocampus in immature animals after LiPC induced SE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, surgical insertion of implants (e.g., neural probes) leads to a temporary disruption of blood vessels [35], possibly resulting in release of serum HAase (~2.6 U mL -1 in human serum) [34]. Thus, it is possible that the electrodes’ ability to prevent cell attachment and migration in vivo can be impaired.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%