2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cell-centered Lagrangian scheme with the preservation of symmetry and conservation properties for compressible fluid flows in two-dimensional cylindrical geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In , Cheng and Shu introduced a very simple and general formulation for obtaining the final node velocity, which is chosen to be the arithmetic average velocity among all the contributions coming from the neighbor elements. As the mesh might be locally highly deformed, we propose to define the node solver scriptNscriptScs using the idea of Cheng and Shu, as was carried out in , but taking a mass weighted average velocity among the neighborhood scriptVk of node k , that is, falseboldV¯kn=1μkTjnscriptVkμk,jfalseboldV¯k,j, with μk=TjnscriptVkμk,j,2emμk,j=ρjn|Tjn|. The local weights μ k , j , which are the masses of the elements Tjn, are defined by multiplying the cell averaged value of density ρjn with the cell area |Tjn|, while the local velocity contributions falseboldV¯k,j are computed by integrating in time the high‐order vertex‐extrapolated velocity at node k as falseboldV¯k,j=()falsefalse01...…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , Cheng and Shu introduced a very simple and general formulation for obtaining the final node velocity, which is chosen to be the arithmetic average velocity among all the contributions coming from the neighbor elements. As the mesh might be locally highly deformed, we propose to define the node solver scriptNscriptScs using the idea of Cheng and Shu, as was carried out in , but taking a mass weighted average velocity among the neighborhood scriptVk of node k , that is, falseboldV¯kn=1μkTjnscriptVkμk,jfalseboldV¯k,j, with μk=TjnscriptVkμk,j,2emμk,j=ρjn|Tjn|. The local weights μ k , j , which are the masses of the elements Tjn, are defined by multiplying the cell averaged value of density ρjn with the cell area |Tjn|, while the local velocity contributions falseboldV¯k,j are computed by integrating in time the high‐order vertex‐extrapolated velocity at node k as falseboldV¯k,j=()falsefalse01...…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh motion, that is, the computation of a unique velocity vector boldVkn for each vertex k , is carried out using the simple and general nodal solver of Cheng and Shu with the modifications introduced in . The final node velocity is given as a mass weighted average among all the contributions V k , j coming from the neighbor elements T j , that is, boldVkn=1μkTjnscriptVkμk,jboldVk,j, with the local weights defined as the product between the cell averaged value of density ρjn and the cell volume |Tjn|: μk=TjnscriptVkμk,j,2emμk,j=ρjn|Tjn|. For each vertex k , we consider its Voronoi neighborhood scriptVk, which is composed by all the neighbors that share the common node k , and for each neighbor we evaluate its local contribution V k , j by integrating in time the high‐order vertex‐extrapolated velocity at node k as boldVk,j=()falsefalse01θl(ξm(k)e,ηm(k)e,ζm(k)e,τ)dτfals...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh motion, that is, the computation of a unique velocity vector V n k for each vertex k, is carried out using the simple and general nodal solver of Cheng and Shu [41,43,44] with the modifications introduced in [48]. The final node velocity is given as a mass weighted average among all the contributions V k;j coming from the neighbor elements T j , that is,…”
Section: Mesh Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalence conditions are used to devise a class of FV schemes, in which all grid-dependent quantities are defined in terms of FE integrals. In the framework of Lagrangian or ALE solvers, the explosion and implosion problems in two spatial dimensions were solved by Cheng and Shu using a cell-centred Lagrangian scheme [14]; Loubère and others used the reconnection algorithm for ALE framework in cylindrical coordinates [15].The present approach moves from the mixed FV/finite element (FE) approach [16], which has been already successfully applied to the multidimensional Cartesian case [17,18] and the cylindrical case with axial symmetry [19], within the throughflow approximation [20] and more recently, in a unified fashion form for orthogonal coordinate systems [21]. The two-dimensional schemes for the polar and the axisymmetrical cases are also explicitly derived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Maire proposed a cell-centred Lagrangian formulation to capture axisymmetrical, that is, spherical, imploding shock waves [11]; Illenseer and Duschl generalized the two-dimensional central upwind to curvilinear grids [12]; Clain and collaborators extended a multi-slope MUSCL scheme to cylindrical coordinates [13]. In the framework of Lagrangian or ALE solvers, the explosion and implosion problems in two spatial dimensions were solved by Cheng and Shu using a cell-centred Lagrangian scheme [14]; Loubère and others used the reconnection algorithm for ALE framework in cylindrical coordinates [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%