2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cell culture model for monitoring α-synuclein cell-to-cell transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these observations seem to go against the general consensus of the literature, several possible explanations might justify these results: (i) the concentration of aSyn-GFP resulting from cell release is too low; (ii) aSyn molecules that find their way inside the cell might be rapidly degraded or re-released—in which case experiments would need to be carried out in a shorter time frame; (iii) molecules enter the cells in a very low number, and consequently have no visible influence on the fluorescence signal; (iv) GFP affects the uptake of or diffusion of aSyn, since it is a larger protein than aSyn itself. Control experiments in which H4 were co-cultured with H4 producing GFP seem to support the last explanation, since no uptake of GFP was observed (Figure 5B), however, other studies reported diffusion of GFP into cells in similar conditions (Reyes et al, 2015). It should be noted that in other studies using extracellular aSyn, internalization was observed after as little as 5 min for monomeric aSyn and 1 h for aSyn fibrils (Lee et al, 2008), which suggests that 10 h is an appropriate time scale for such an experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these observations seem to go against the general consensus of the literature, several possible explanations might justify these results: (i) the concentration of aSyn-GFP resulting from cell release is too low; (ii) aSyn molecules that find their way inside the cell might be rapidly degraded or re-released—in which case experiments would need to be carried out in a shorter time frame; (iii) molecules enter the cells in a very low number, and consequently have no visible influence on the fluorescence signal; (iv) GFP affects the uptake of or diffusion of aSyn, since it is a larger protein than aSyn itself. Control experiments in which H4 were co-cultured with H4 producing GFP seem to support the last explanation, since no uptake of GFP was observed (Figure 5B), however, other studies reported diffusion of GFP into cells in similar conditions (Reyes et al, 2015). It should be noted that in other studies using extracellular aSyn, internalization was observed after as little as 5 min for monomeric aSyn and 1 h for aSyn fibrils (Lee et al, 2008), which suggests that 10 h is an appropriate time scale for such an experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, these studies rely either on the use of previously prepared conditioned medium (Lee et al, 2008, 2010), i.e., medium in which cells released aSyn, or on culturing a populations expressing tagged aSyn together with another population expressing another fluorescent molecule (Reyes et al, 2015). This platform allows us to monitor the spreading of aSyn without the need for using recombinantly produced protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of the dynamin inhibitor dynasore, instead of the expected perinuclear accumulation, the ␣-syn immunoreactivity was excluded from the cell interior and retained at the periphery adjacent to the plasma membrane. Despite the qualitatively different intracellular localization, the overall signal for each ␣-syn isoform was not greatly reduced, indicating normal cell surface binding and sequestration, and consistent with a blockade of dynamindependent endocytosis (69,(72)(73)(74). Interestingly, the dynasore treatment accentuated the differential accumulation of the non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated WT ␣-syn, raising the possibility that the endocytosed ␣-syn may normally undergo trafficking to organelles with protein degradation machinery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In these human neurons an increase of alphasynuclein levels was found and the pathological phenotype was reverted when the mutation causing the Gaucher pathology was corrected (Schöndorf et al, 2014). Similarly, iPSCs from PD patients carrying an alpha-synuclein triplication have been shown to transmit alpha-synuclein pathology to neighbour N2a cells in a non-mixed co-culture experiment (Reyes et al, 2014). These results, not involving cell to cell contact, are in agreement with previous data from other groups showing that alpha-synuclein aggregates are secreted by cells through exosomes into the media in a calcium-dependent manner and subsequently uptaken by naïve cells (Alvarez-Erviti et al, 2011;Emmanouilidou et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cellular Models Of Alpha-synuclein Pathology And/or Spreadingmentioning
confidence: 92%