2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A change of variable formula for the 2D fractional Brownian motion of Hurst index bigger or equal to 1/4

Abstract: We prove a change of variable formula for the 2D fractional Brownian motion of index H bigger or equal to 1/4. For H strictly bigger than 1/4, our formula coincides with that obtained by using the rough paths theory. For H = 1/4 (the more interesting case), there is an additional term that is a classical Wiener integral against an independent standard Brownian motion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other central limit theorems have been obtained for sums of integer powers of increments of one-dimensional fBm (see [2,17,14] for instance). The most closely related result is maybe that of I. Nourdin [13] which shows an Itô-type formula for a two-dimensional fBm with Hurst index H = 1/4 with a 'bracket-term' involving an independent Brownian motion, but the results are of a very different nature than ours (also, they hold precisely for H = 1/4, whereas our results concern the case H < 1/4). Note also the paper by Y. Hu and D. Nualart [7] which gives a Brownian scaling limit for the self-intersection local time for α large enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Other central limit theorems have been obtained for sums of integer powers of increments of one-dimensional fBm (see [2,17,14] for instance). The most closely related result is maybe that of I. Nourdin [13] which shows an Itô-type formula for a two-dimensional fBm with Hurst index H = 1/4 with a 'bracket-term' involving an independent Brownian motion, but the results are of a very different nature than ours (also, they hold precisely for H = 1/4, whereas our results concern the case H < 1/4). Note also the paper by Y. Hu and D. Nualart [7] which gives a Brownian scaling limit for the self-intersection local time for α large enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…We first calculate the second mixed derivative ∂ 2δ2 /∂s∂t, whereδ is the canonical metric of Z, because we must show |µ| (OD) ≤ ε 2α , which is condition (12), and µ (dsdt) = ds dt ∂ 2δ2 /∂s∂t. We have, for 0 ≤ s ≤ t − ε, δ 2 (s, t) = We now prove (26). We can write…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We now prove (26). We can write For A, we use the hypotheses of this proposition: for the last factor in A, we exploit the fact that g is decreasing in t while f is increasing in t; for the other factor in A, use the bound on ∂g/∂t; thus we have We separate the integral in u into two pieces, for u ∈ [0, s − ε] and u ∈ [s − ε, s].…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formula (1.11) is related to a recent line of research in which, by means of Malliavin calculus, one aims to exhibit change-of-variable formulas in law with a correction term which is an Itô integral with respect to martingale independent of the underlying Gaussian processes. Papers dealing with this problem and which are prior to our work include [4,7,8,9,12,15,16]; however, it is worthwhile noting that all these mentioned references only deal with Gaussian processes, not with iterated processes (which are arguably more difficult to handle).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%