1974
DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1974.11993711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Characterization of Completely Multiplicative Arithmetic Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. From hypothesis, we have Now proceed by induction noting, as in the lemma of Carroll [4], that f (1) = 1 and f (p i ) = f (p) i (i = 1,...,k− 1) imply f −1 (p i ) = 0 (i = 2, 3,...,k− 1). We thus have…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let F Be a Nonzero Multiplicative Function And mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proof. From hypothesis, we have Now proceed by induction noting, as in the lemma of Carroll [4], that f (1) = 1 and f (p i ) = f (p) i (i = 1,...,k− 1) imply f −1 (p i ) = 0 (i = 2, 3,...,k− 1). We thus have…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let F Be a Nonzero Multiplicative Function And mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another question arises from the fact that the UFD A * has a rich ideal structure [2,32]. Is there a representation of these ideals in terms of symmetric polynomials?…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier work which appeared in [23] (also see [2] and [3] ), a construction was given which provided a q-th root, q ∈ Q, for every element of the WIP-module, thus giving an effective construction of the divisible closure (injective hull) of the WIP-module. So, in particular, providing a construction for the q−roots of any multiplicative function.…”
Section: Wip-module Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation