2006
DOI: 10.1007/11867340_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Characterization of Meaningful Schedulers for Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conjecture that our transformation is also measure-preserving for TTH and TH schedulers. Finally, late schedulers are shown to be able to improve upon generic schedulers [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We conjecture that our transformation is also measure-preserving for TTH and TH schedulers. Finally, late schedulers are shown to be able to improve upon generic schedulers [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hierarchy refines the notion of generic measurable schedulers [6]. An important distinguishing criterion is the level of detail of timing information the schedulers may exploit, e.g., the delay in the last state, total time (TT), or all individual state residence times (T).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out in [17], not all schedulers are meaningful, even in the restricted case of continuous-time Markov decision processes (CTMDPs). In particular, under some schedulers, the set of runs reaching a given location can be non-measurable.…”
Section: Schedulers For Tamdpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this result is perhaps not surprising, its proof is non-trivial and strongly relies on measure-theoretic aspects. It shows that reasoning about CTMDPs, as witnessed also by [30,7,10] is not straightforward. As for MDPs, CSL equivalence does not coincide with bisimulation as only maximal and minimal probabilities can be logically expressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%