2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2012.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of the behavior of the Anderson acceleration on linear problems

Abstract: We give a complete characterization of the behavior of the Anderson acceleration (with arbitrary nonzero mixing parameters) on linear problems. Let ν be the grade of the residual at the starting point with respect to the matrix defining the linear problem. We show that if Anderson acceleration does not stagnate (that is, produces different iterates) up to ν, then the sequence of its iterates converges to the exact solution of the linear problem. Otherwise, the Anderson acceleration converges to a point that is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson acceleration is related to multisecant methods (extensions of quasi-Newton methods involving multiple secant conditions); in fact, Eyert [16] proves that it is equivalent to the so-called "bad" Broyden's method [11,28], and a similar analysis is done by Fang and Saad [17] and Rohwedder and Schneider [43]. For linear systems, if m k = k for each k then Anderson acceleration is essentially equivalent to the generalized minimal residual (GMRES) method [44], as shown by Potra and Engler [36], Rohwedder and Schneider [43], and Walker and Ni [50]. For nonlinear problems Rohwedder and Schneider [43] show that Anderson acceleration is locally linearly convergent under certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Anderson acceleration is related to multisecant methods (extensions of quasi-Newton methods involving multiple secant conditions); in fact, Eyert [16] proves that it is equivalent to the so-called "bad" Broyden's method [11,28], and a similar analysis is done by Fang and Saad [17] and Rohwedder and Schneider [43]. For linear systems, if m k = k for each k then Anderson acceleration is essentially equivalent to the generalized minimal residual (GMRES) method [44], as shown by Potra and Engler [36], Rohwedder and Schneider [43], and Walker and Ni [50]. For nonlinear problems Rohwedder and Schneider [43] show that Anderson acceleration is locally linearly convergent under certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…From a mathematical perspective, Pulay's technique can be considered to be a multisecant type method [4] that represents a specific variant of Broyden's approach [13]. In the linear setting, the DIIS approach bears remarkable similarity to the Generalized Minimal Residual (GMRES) method [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to other works on AR, it is possible to identify a connection between AAR and GMRES . Let us assume again that m = k at first.…”
Section: Aar Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of comparing the way full AAR and full GMRES work, we need to introduce some quantities that are employed to describe the behavior of the methods. Following the work of Potra and Engler, we introduce the stagnation index as ηG=minN:xG=xG+1, where boldxG is the approximate solution computed by full GMRES at the ℓ th iteration. In the work of Wilkinson, the grade of r 0 ≠ 0 with respect to A is defined as ν(A,r0)=maxN:dimK(A,r0)=, with scriptKpfalse(A,boldr0false) being the p ‐dimensional Krylov subspace defined on matrix A and vector r 0 .…”
Section: Aar Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation