2015
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2014.2363517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Charge Recycling SAR ADC With a LSB-Down Switching Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a supply voltage fluctuation of 50 mV pp , the proposed design has a similar SNDR to other designs. We noted that the power consumption of the ADC core reported in references [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] do not consider the reference-voltage regulator. Hence, for fair comparison, we provided the estimated power consumed in these reference-voltage regulators in Table 1 .…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With a supply voltage fluctuation of 50 mV pp , the proposed design has a similar SNDR to other designs. We noted that the power consumption of the ADC core reported in references [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] do not consider the reference-voltage regulator. Hence, for fair comparison, we provided the estimated power consumed in these reference-voltage regulators in Table 1 .…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… * STP stands for self-timed pre-charging. ** Power consumption of reference-voltage regulators needed in references [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] are estimated based on the regulator used in reference [ 4 ] with the assumption that they have the same regulator FOM reg defined in reference [ 10 ] and the same dropout voltage. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, reducing DAC switching power is recently a crucial topic to improve the overall power efficiency. Several low-power DAC switching techniques have been published including energy saving [1], charge recycling switching (CRS) [2], input range prediction (IRP) [3], charge average switching (CAS) [4], charge recycling with LSB-down [5], set-and-down [6], merge-and-split (MS) [7], bidirectional single-side (BSS) [8], Manuscript V cm -based [9], and one-side switching instead (OSSI)+higherbit switching instead (HBSI) [10] to reduce the switching energy by 69%, 71%, 74%, 75%, 77%, 81%, 83%, 86%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, compared with the conventional approach [6]. The switching power can also be reduced by detecting the input range and skipping unnecessary switching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%