2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Child With Longitudinal Cleavage of the Upper Extremity: Treatment and Etiology Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As no structures were duplicated, the anomaly does not belong to the spectrum of mirror hand. Several classification schemes for cleft hand exist, but none of these describe proximal involvement other than radio-ulnar synostosis (Al-Qattan, 2014;Shah et al, 2010). In the OMT-classification, this anomaly could be characterized as malformation-entire limb-unspecified axis (IA4), but it does not exactly fit any existing sub-classification (Tonkin et al, 2013).The presentation of this rare upper extremity anomaly is a forearm cleavage, less severe than the previously described case of total upper extremity cleavage described by Shah et al (2010), but more severe than a conventional cleft hand.…”
Section: Congenital Longitudinal Cleavage Of the Forearmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As no structures were duplicated, the anomaly does not belong to the spectrum of mirror hand. Several classification schemes for cleft hand exist, but none of these describe proximal involvement other than radio-ulnar synostosis (Al-Qattan, 2014;Shah et al, 2010). In the OMT-classification, this anomaly could be characterized as malformation-entire limb-unspecified axis (IA4), but it does not exactly fit any existing sub-classification (Tonkin et al, 2013).The presentation of this rare upper extremity anomaly is a forearm cleavage, less severe than the previously described case of total upper extremity cleavage described by Shah et al (2010), but more severe than a conventional cleft hand.…”
Section: Congenital Longitudinal Cleavage Of the Forearmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of one previous report of total longitudinal upper extremity cleavage (Shah et al., 2010). This rare anomaly was considered to represent a proximal manifestation of cleft hand complex with early limb bud cleavage affecting the apical ectodermal ridge and mesoderm (Shah et al., 2010). In this case, the family history was also negative for other orthopaedic abnormalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of one previous report of total longitudinal upper extremity cleavage (Shah et al, 2010). This rare anomaly was considered to represent a proximal manifestation of cleft hand complex with early limb bud cleavage affecting the apical ectodermal ridge and mesoderm (Shah et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no structures were duplicated, the anomaly does not belong to the spectrum of mirror hand. Several classification schemes for cleft hand exist, but none of these describe proximal involvement other than radio-ulnar synostosis (Al-Qattan, 2014;Shah et al, 2010). In the OMT-classification, this anomaly could be characterized as malformation-entire limb-unspecified axis (IA4), but it does not exactly fit any existing sub-classification (Tonkin et al, 2013).The presentation of this rare upper extremity anomaly is a forearm cleavage, less severe than the previously described case of total upper extremity cleavage described by Shah et al (2010), but more severe than a conventional cleft hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%