2003
DOI: 10.3368/er.21.1.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Citizen's Call for Ecological Forest Restoration: Forest Restoration Principles and Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Restorative measures can be active or passive depending on site-specific needs and should always be followed with wellfunded monitoring (DellaSala et al 2003). Examples include removal of livestock, invasive species abatement, road closures and obliteration, and reintroduction of fire.…”
Section: Principle 6 -Reduce Land-use Stressors That Compromise the Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Restorative measures can be active or passive depending on site-specific needs and should always be followed with wellfunded monitoring (DellaSala et al 2003). Examples include removal of livestock, invasive species abatement, road closures and obliteration, and reintroduction of fire.…”
Section: Principle 6 -Reduce Land-use Stressors That Compromise the Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration approaches should identify comparable areas of high ecological integrity (e.g., unmanaged CESFs, DellaSala et al 2003) to serve as a baseline or reference condition from which to restore degraded areas (e.g., burned plantations), and then surveillance, implementation, effectiveness, and ecological effects monitoring (Hutto and Belote 2013) should always be an integral part of the restoration activity.…”
Section: Principle 5 -Limit Post-fire Management To Early Seral Foresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential complementarity of forest restoration and fire protection, organizations with these two different overarching goals did not appear to frequently work together or seek information from each other, i.e., more than expected by chance, and organizations with different attitudes toward wildfire did not work together frequently. This finding suggests that despite recent policy initiatives and a growing advocacy movement to integrate protection and restoration goals and strategies (DellaSala 2003, Butler and Goldstein 2010, Wildland Fire Leadership Council 2016, the institutional cultures of fire protection and forest restoration remain distinct, even in the ECE where significant progress has been made on collaboration on forest and, separately, fire management (Davis et al 2012, Oregon Solutions 2013, Summers 2014. This cleavage between forest restoration and fire protection may be a legacy of the long history of state and federal policy that has separated fire protection and forest restoration administratively and prioritized the fire suppression in forested areas (Steelman and Burke 2007), a policy pattern that arguably has yielded insular institutional tendencies that are difficult to change (Sabatier et al 1995, Fischer et al 2016.…”
Section: Implications For Adaptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since land-use conversion and degradation processes are recent in the Xingu Basin, with extensive undisturbed areas remaining, the natural or unassisted recovery of ecosystems ('passive restoration' sensu [15,16]) was expected to be possible throughout the basin. However, the strong ecological filters or barriers, particularly the long dry season facilitating uncontrolled fires and the African grasses constraining the forest regeneration, meant that intervention was necessary in almost half the areas.…”
Section: One Size Does Not Fit All: Developing Local Technology For Ementioning
confidence: 99%