2020
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202018.0285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A class of multi-resolution approximations for large spatial datasets

Abstract: Gaussian processes are popular and flexible models for spatial, temporal, and functional data, but they are computationally infeasible for large datasets. We discuss Gaussian-process approximations that use basis functions at multiple resolutions to achieve fast inference and that can (approximately) represent any spatial covariance structure. We consider two special cases of this multi-resolution-approximation framework, a taper version and a domain-partitioning (block) version. We describe theoretical proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scalability of the MRA is ensured in that for increasing resolution, the number of basis functions increases while the support of each function (i.e., the part of the spatial domain in which it is nonzero) decreases. Decreasing support (and increasing sparsity of the covariance matrices of the corresponding weights) is achieved either by increasingly severe tapering of the covariance function (MRA-taper; Katzfuss and Gong 2017) or by recursively partitioning the spatial domain (MRAblock; Katzfuss, 2017). This can lead to (nearly) exact approximations with quasilinear computational complexity.…”
Section: Multiresolution Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalability of the MRA is ensured in that for increasing resolution, the number of basis functions increases while the support of each function (i.e., the part of the spatial domain in which it is nonzero) decreases. Decreasing support (and increasing sparsity of the covariance matrices of the corresponding weights) is achieved either by increasingly severe tapering of the covariance function (MRA-taper; Katzfuss and Gong 2017) or by recursively partitioning the spatial domain (MRAblock; Katzfuss, 2017). This can lead to (nearly) exact approximations with quasilinear computational complexity.…”
Section: Multiresolution Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-linear computational complexity can be achieved by applying these mechanisms hierarchically on multiple scales. Examples of hierarchical sparse approximations include wavelet methods (e.g., [7]), the multi-resolution approximation [29,30], and (implicitly) some versions of the Vecchia approximation [31]. Hierarchical application of low-rank approximations leads to hierarchical matrices [22,24,23,8,1,25,9,10,57], which are an algebraic abstraction of the fast multipole method [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we provide an efficient method for analyzing global Level-2 satellite data based on the multi-resolution approximation (M -RA) for spatial processes first introduced in Katzfuss (2017) and Katzfuss and Gong (2020), which uses a large number of basis functions to capture spatial variation at all scales while being highly computationally efficient. In contrast to related multi-resolution wavelet models (e.g., the MRVA), the M -RA is directly applicable to irregularly spaced observations, allows proper probabilistic inference, and the basis functions can adjust flexibly to spatially-varying dependence structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%