Proceedings of the 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3233027.3233035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of product sampling for software product lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we cannot take the whole sample of QuickSampler or UniGen and we rather need to take an excerpt of this sample. Various sub-sampling strategies can be considered [24], [40] either based on random, t-wise, etc. Without an uniform distribution, the sub-sampling process will operate over a non-representative configuration set, which may incidentally promote or underestimate some features.…”
Section: B Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, we cannot take the whole sample of QuickSampler or UniGen and we rather need to take an excerpt of this sample. Various sub-sampling strategies can be considered [24], [40] either based on random, t-wise, etc. Without an uniform distribution, the sub-sampling process will operate over a non-representative configuration set, which may incidentally promote or underestimate some features.…”
Section: B Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configurable Systems Sampling: As outlined by a recent survey by Varshosaz et al [40], many artifacts of configurable systems have been considered for sampling, such as feature models, code, tests, etc. The authors also indicate that feature model remains the de facto standard input for many sampling techniques and note a certain prominence of greedy and metaheuristic-based algorithms, which are heavy consumers of random samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An FM is treelike structure encompassing a set of features and constraints among them. Since feature modeling is a popular way of documenting commonality and variability of an SPL in both academic and industrial communities [4], [10], [64], it makes sense to develop FM-based SPL testing techniques. clause if the feature model is transformed to a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF) [65].…”
Section: Feature Model Configurations As Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, even if one could test all valid products (for small-scale FMs), it is likely to be inefficient because software testers often have a limited amount of test resources [8], like time and budgets. Therefore, software testers are seeking sampling approaches to reduce the size of products under test so as to meet the release deadline or resource constraints [10]. The combinatorial interaction testing (CIT) [11], among others, is a prominent approach that has been introduced to reduce the size of the test suites while achieving a certain coverage of feature combinations [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, the generation method should allow the formulation of architectures with diverse shapes (in terms of layers). Such Manuscript submitted to ACM techniques have been intensively studied and compared in the area of configurable systems [22,35]. Here, we aim at demonstrating that it is possible to represent and search the DNN architecture space so that we can find useful configurations.…”
Section: Forming Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%