2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of web browsing on mobile devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Roudaki et al [30] summarized various approaches for this purpose. Qiu et al [31] compared methods for adapting and rendering web pages on small display devices by breaking them down into a structural overview and detail views for content.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roudaki et al [30] summarized various approaches for this purpose. Qiu et al [31] compared methods for adapting and rendering web pages on small display devices by breaking them down into a structural overview and detail views for content.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers conducted usability evaluations of different interface designs for various applications, including social-networking sites [2] and browsing tabular data on small-display devices [13]. Roudaki et al [15] comprehensively evaluated the users' preference for mobile browsing techniques such as platform-specific mobile design, web page restructuring, and zooming based interaction.…”
Section: Interface Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP methodology was applied to obtain preference of evaluation criteria and the extension of the TOPSIS is applied to rank the mobile phone alternatives. In another study, Roudaki et al (2015) compared various techniques for web browsing usability on mobile devices from six perspectives, i.e., development cost, consistency with the desktop version, dynamic content supports, hardware requirements, display optimisation and user operation. The identical mobile phones were manipulated with regard to their visual appearance to determine the influence of appearance on perceived usability, performance measures and perceived attractiveness.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When consumers buy products, they expect the products to meet their standards and they expect them to be 'usable' (Chan et al, 2011;Eraslan, 2013;Lee et al, 2015;Roudaki et al, 2015). Product usability is a measure of how effectively, satisfactorily and efficiently a product is used by specific consumers for specific aims (ISO 9241-11, 1998;Harvey et al, 2011;Sauer and Sonderegger, 2009;Sonderegger and Sauer, 2010;Sonderegger et al, 2012;Eraslan, 2013;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%