Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The aim of this study was to identify biomedical risk factors for the development of preeclampsia of varying severity in the group of examined pregnant women. Material and methods. 70 women whose pregnancy was complicated by the development of preeclampsia were under observation. The first group included 46 (65.7%) patients with moderate preeclampsia; the second group included 24 (34.2%) women with severe preeclampsia. The diagnosis was established on the basis of the patient's complaints, clinical examination, somatic, obstetric and gynecological anamnesis, analysis of the course of the present pregnancy, ultrasound fetometry and Dopplerometry findings. The patients who participated in the study had an assessment of clinical and anamnestic parameters, somatic status, obstetric and gynecological anamnesis. Data from 45 pregnant women with an unencumbered obstetric and gynecological history and a physiologically occurring pregnancy were used as control values. Results. The prognostic risk factors for the development of moderate and severe preeclampsia were analyzed based on the calculation of relative risk indicators (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). In the group of pregnant women with both severe and moderate preeclampsia, strong prognostic risk factors were: place of residence in the regions, extragenital pathology in the anamnesis, gynecological diseases in the anamnesis, the number of pregnancies in the anamnesis, birth parity, and arterial hypertension. The early identification of risk factors for moderate and severe preeclampsia enables timely preventive measures, thereby improving patient outcomes and prognosis. Conclusion. The analysis revealed that preeclampsia was more prevalent among pregnant women with a history of various extragenital diseases, a complicated obstetric and gynecological history, and concomitant hypertension.
The aim of this study was to identify biomedical risk factors for the development of preeclampsia of varying severity in the group of examined pregnant women. Material and methods. 70 women whose pregnancy was complicated by the development of preeclampsia were under observation. The first group included 46 (65.7%) patients with moderate preeclampsia; the second group included 24 (34.2%) women with severe preeclampsia. The diagnosis was established on the basis of the patient's complaints, clinical examination, somatic, obstetric and gynecological anamnesis, analysis of the course of the present pregnancy, ultrasound fetometry and Dopplerometry findings. The patients who participated in the study had an assessment of clinical and anamnestic parameters, somatic status, obstetric and gynecological anamnesis. Data from 45 pregnant women with an unencumbered obstetric and gynecological history and a physiologically occurring pregnancy were used as control values. Results. The prognostic risk factors for the development of moderate and severe preeclampsia were analyzed based on the calculation of relative risk indicators (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). In the group of pregnant women with both severe and moderate preeclampsia, strong prognostic risk factors were: place of residence in the regions, extragenital pathology in the anamnesis, gynecological diseases in the anamnesis, the number of pregnancies in the anamnesis, birth parity, and arterial hypertension. The early identification of risk factors for moderate and severe preeclampsia enables timely preventive measures, thereby improving patient outcomes and prognosis. Conclusion. The analysis revealed that preeclampsia was more prevalent among pregnant women with a history of various extragenital diseases, a complicated obstetric and gynecological history, and concomitant hypertension.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.