2015
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20151271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical study of prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors at a tertiary care centre in Karnataka, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, advanced maternal age, high BMI and positive family history of DM had statistically significant association with abnormal GCT which is similar to other studies (6,7,8) where advanced maternal age, high BMI and positive family history of DM had statistically significant association with GDM(p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, advanced maternal age, high BMI and positive family history of DM had statistically significant association with abnormal GCT which is similar to other studies (6,7,8) where advanced maternal age, high BMI and positive family history of DM had statistically significant association with GDM(p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…16 Though Al-Rowaily et al found multiparous women were more likely to have GDM than nulliparous women. 17 Like Duman, this study also found high bodymass index and positive family history of diabetes as associated risk factors. In our study we found bad obstetric history and history of macrosomia in previous pregnancy as associated risk factors which is supported by a study done in Karnataka by Shridevi et al 18 The study by Shridevi et al also found a greater prevalence of GDM in women with advanced age, obesity, family h/o DM and past h/o GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Fatthy et al [ 22 ] and Shridevi et al [ 23 ] showed that BMI >30 was significantly associated with the risk of developing GDM. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.633) between the BMI of the two groups in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%