2021
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinician's Guide to the Treatment of Endometriosis with Elagolix

Abstract: Pain associated with endometriosis is a considerable burden for women, permeating all aspects of their lives, from their ability to perform daily activities to their quality of life. Although there are many options for endometriosis-associated pain management, they are often limited by insufficient efficacy, inconvenient routes of administration, and/or intolerable side effects. Elagolix, a nonpeptide, small-molecule gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, is the first new oral therapy to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, according to Wang et al [ 106 ], two recently FDA-approved doses of elagolix for management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with endometriosis (24 months, 150 mg, once daily; and 6 months, 200 mg, twice daily) both proved cost-effective versus leuprolide acetate over a time frame of 1–2 years. Although there are still areas that require further scrutiny in terms of efficacy and safety in real-world populations, potential use of ABT, and comparisons with OCPs and progestins [ 107 ], we agree with Leyland et al [ 108 ] that clinical evidence clearly demonstrates that oral GnRH antagonists are effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Of course, studies comparing the efficacy of GnRH antagonists with OCPs and progestins are mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, according to Wang et al [ 106 ], two recently FDA-approved doses of elagolix for management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with endometriosis (24 months, 150 mg, once daily; and 6 months, 200 mg, twice daily) both proved cost-effective versus leuprolide acetate over a time frame of 1–2 years. Although there are still areas that require further scrutiny in terms of efficacy and safety in real-world populations, potential use of ABT, and comparisons with OCPs and progestins [ 107 ], we agree with Leyland et al [ 108 ] that clinical evidence clearly demonstrates that oral GnRH antagonists are effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Of course, studies comparing the efficacy of GnRH antagonists with OCPs and progestins are mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Since its approval by the FDA in July 2018, elagolix has become the first GnRH antagonist used for the management and treatment of moderate to severe endometriosisassociated pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, as well as dyspareunia, due to its high binding affinity for GnRHR, decreased interactions with hepatic P450 enzymes, avoidance of the flare-up effect of the GnRH agonists, and its efficacy in suppressing LH, FSH and E 2 levels. 2,[22][23][24][25]28,[30][31][32] Elagolix is given at doses of 150mg once a day during a 24 monthperiod, causing partial estrogen suppression, and 200 mg twice a day for 6 months, resulting in full estrogen suppression, allowing an adequate and individual control of hypoestrogenic side effects. 4,22,32 The tablet should be taken at approximately the same time, every day, with or without food.…”
Section: Endometriosis and Adenomyosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of surgical treatment, pharmacotherapies aimed at the reduction of leiomyoma and uterine volume or improvement of anemia are also introduced before the surgical treatment to conduct less invasive surgery(i.e., to reduce blood loss or surgical duration). However, the clinician often encounters cases in which menopausal symptoms are thought to be drug-related at about eight weeks after the beginning of treatment, making it di cult to continue treatment [14]. And by the phase III trial designed for relugolix administration to patients with leiomyoma, the leiomyoma volume as a secondary endpoint reduced by 43.28±33.85% by 12 weeks and 49.75±34.33% by 24 weeks of administration compared with the baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%