A “Closed” Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Improves Resource Utilization When Compared with an “Open” MICU

Abstract

We hypothesized that a "closed" intensive care unit (ICU) was more efficient that an "open" one. ICU admissions were retrospectively analyzed before and after ICU closure at one hospital; prospective analysis in that ICU with an open ICU nearby was done. Illness severity was gauged by the Mortality Prediction Model (MPM0). Outcomes included mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mechanical ventilation (MV). There were no differences in age, MPM0, and use of MV. ICU and hospital LOS were lower when "closed" (ICU LOS: prospective 6.1 versus 12.6 d, p < 0.0001; retrospective 6.1 versus 9.3 d, p < 0.05; hospital LOS: prospective 19.2 versus 33.2 d, p < 0.008; retrospective 22.2 versus 31.2 d, p < 0.02). Days on MV were lower when "closed" (prospective 2.3 versus 8.5 d, p < 0.0005; retrospective 3.3 versus 6.4 d, p < 0.05). Pooled data revealed the following: MV predicted ICU LOS; ICU organization and MPM0 predicted days on MV; MV and ICU organization predicted hospital LOS; mortality predictors were open ICU (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, p < 0.04), MPM0 (OR 1.16 for MPM0 increase 0.1, p < 0.002), and MV (OR 2.43, p < 0.0001). We conclude that patient care is more efficient with a closed ICU, and that mortality is not adversely affected.

Intensive care unit telemedicine: Alternate paradigm for providing continuous intensivist care

“…Data from multiple ICU environments (medical, surgical, pediatric) indicate that intensivist-based care programs reduce complications and deliver improved patient outcomes (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The value of intensivist care models likely derives from multiple sources.…”

“…Avoidable adverse events occur frequently in ICU patients and contribute to adverse outcomes (4 -6). Despite numerous studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes when ICUs are staffed by full-time intensivists (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), a variety of different care models exist in U.S. ICUs. Commonly cited reasons that most U.S. hospitals do not have dedicated intensivists include concerns about costs, practice preferences, and a shortage of ICU physicians.…”

Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: Transformation of the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit and the Emerging Need for New Medical Staffing and Training Models

“…The results of more than 10 nonrandomized studies indicate that ICUs managed by intensivists achieve superior clinical outcomes, including reduced length of stay and associated costs, 65,66 length of mechanical ventilation, 60 and mortality. 6 -9,61,67,68 In the majority of these studies, high-intensity ICU physician staffing has been defined as mandatory intensivist consultation or a closed ICU and compared with low-intensity staffing, defined as no intensivist or elective intensivist consultation.…”

Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects

“…The ICU is preferably an independent unit or department that functions as a closed unit under the full medical responsibility of the ICU staff in close concert with the referring medical specialists [2,3]. It has a defined geographical location concentrating the human and technical resources, such as manpower, professional skills and competencies, technical equipment, and the necessary space.…”