1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at General Dental Service orthodontics in England and Wales II: What determines appliance selection?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been found by other authors, which suggests that the differences found in the preference for some appliances are related to the country and academic background, 3,4 academic training, 4,18-20 years of experience, 3 laboratory costs of appliance production, level of education, and scientific knowledge of the clinician. 7 Turbill et al, 21 observed that the age at treatment, the academic background of the clinician, the severity of the malocclusion, and the clinician's income are major factors influencing the selection of appliances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been found by other authors, which suggests that the differences found in the preference for some appliances are related to the country and academic background, 3,4 academic training, 4,18-20 years of experience, 3 laboratory costs of appliance production, level of education, and scientific knowledge of the clinician. 7 Turbill et al, 21 observed that the age at treatment, the academic background of the clinician, the severity of the malocclusion, and the clinician's income are major factors influencing the selection of appliances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diferentes estudios han asociado las preferencias en la indicación de los aparatos ortopédicos con diversos factores como el país o la región geográfica (25,26,29), el desarrollo académico del clínico (29,33,34), los costos de laboratorio y los años de práctica (25). Azevedo y colaboradores (35) en Brasil, evaluaron la concordancia de indicación de tratamiento para maloclusión de sujetos Clase II en crecimiento entre un grupo de ortodoncistas formadores de opinión a nivel internacional y un grupo de ortodoncistas clínicos, encontrando que los clínicos tienden al tratamiento muy precoz, mientras los académicos tienden a tratar en el pico de crecimiento puberal lo cual está acorde con la evidencia en la literatura sobre tiempo adecuado de tratamiento de la maloclusión de Clase II.…”
Section: Thematic Fieldsunclassified