2000 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.00CH37017)
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2000.861103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CMOS resistive ring mixer MMICs for GSM 900 and DCS 1800 base station applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General parasitic circuit resistance is minimized by using thick inductor metal for all circuit connections, inductors and device access [9]. We made smaller value capacitors array to minimize the series resistance of the DC blocking capacitors on LO and RF ports.…”
Section: Mixer Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General parasitic circuit resistance is minimized by using thick inductor metal for all circuit connections, inductors and device access [9]. We made smaller value capacitors array to minimize the series resistance of the DC blocking capacitors on LO and RF ports.…”
Section: Mixer Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the 900-and 1800-MHz mixers are passive devices and, therefore, require no dc bias. These resistive CMOS mixers have a double-balanced ring structure and maintain their conversion loss level over a wide range of an LO input power level [10]. The conversion loss of the 900-and 1800-MHz mixer is 6.3 and 6.4 dB, respectively.…”
Section: Mixermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double‐balanced resistive mixer also exhibits inherent high linearity [2, 3], and it has been shown to be suitable for both homodyne and heterodyne wireless transceivers [4]. Most double‐balanced mixers reported to date have been implemented using four MOSFETs (mixer core) and additional passive elements for RF [5–7], LO [5, 6], and IF matching [7], and to improve LO efficiency [8]. These passive elements occupy significantly more space on the chip die than the mixer transistor core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These passive elements occupy significantly more space on the chip die than the mixer transistor core. In addition, typically, a double‐balanced mixer configuration requires single‐ended to differential transitions at the RF and LO ports, which are usually implemented off‐chip [4–9], adding cost, size, and complexity. If used in direct down‐conversion receivers, these mixers typically require DC cancellation circuitry to eliminate large DC offset [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%