2021
DOI: 10.1049/rsn2.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A co‐occurrence matrix‐based matching area selection algorithm for underwater gravity‐aided inertial navigation

Abstract: The matching area selection algorithm is one of the key technologies for underwater gravity‐aided inertial navigation system, which directly affects the positioning accuracy and matching rate of underwater navigation. The traditional matching area selection algorithms usually use the statistical characteristic parameters of gravity field. However, the traditional algorithms are difficult to reflect the spatial relation characteristic of gravity field, which always miss some latent matching areas with obvious c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the relationship between gravity anomaly features and suitable areas, 15 existing gravity features are used to construct a gravity anomaly feature set. The feature set includes standard deviation (F1), roughness (F2), slope (F3), slope standard deviation (F4), correlation coefficient (F5), kurtosis (F6), skewness (F7), range (F8), and mean (F9), and gray histogram complexity (F10), the sum of gravity anomaly gradient values (F11), energy (F12), Contrast (F13), inverse differential moment (F14), and Correlation (F15) in the field of image processing [9,10] . In addition, the sample data is standardized by z-score standardization to eliminate the difference caused by the value range or different dimensions of different feature parameters.…”
Section: The Gravity Anomaly Feature Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the relationship between gravity anomaly features and suitable areas, 15 existing gravity features are used to construct a gravity anomaly feature set. The feature set includes standard deviation (F1), roughness (F2), slope (F3), slope standard deviation (F4), correlation coefficient (F5), kurtosis (F6), skewness (F7), range (F8), and mean (F9), and gray histogram complexity (F10), the sum of gravity anomaly gradient values (F11), energy (F12), Contrast (F13), inverse differential moment (F14), and Correlation (F15) in the field of image processing [9,10] . In addition, the sample data is standardized by z-score standardization to eliminate the difference caused by the value range or different dimensions of different feature parameters.…”
Section: The Gravity Anomaly Feature Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four spatial relationship feature parameters are weighted and summed, and the comprehensive spatial feature parameters are established. The matching area is selected based on the criterion of maximizing the variance between classes [15]. In 2023, Zou, Jiasheng et al used the SPEARMAN-DEMATEL-ANP structural evaluation method to combine traditional gravity characteristic parameters with fractal geometric parameters for selecting gravity matching adaptation zones [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-precision gravity data can be leveraged to study geodynamic and seismic processes, mineral resource exploration, and environmental science (Wang et al, 2004;Sun, 2017). It can be subdivided into various industry applications, such as satellite orbits, long-range missile strikes, and other national defence and military fields (Liu, 2019;Xi et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020), submarine navigation, and even high-precision autonomous navigation fields (Wu, 2011). It also includes disaster prevention fields, such as Earth observation from space and natural disaster monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses an absolute gravimeter to measure the change in gravity of the gravitational reference point, and mobile and continuous gravity measurements to improve the spatial and temporal resolution, respectively (Furuya et al, 2003;Hinderer et al, 2015;Fu and She, 2017;Zhu et al, 2017). Based on an error correction model that has gradually evolved in recent years, the high-precision planar gravity value obtained using comprehensive data correction has been successfully applied in research on groundwater level change (Sun, 2017;Xi et al, 2019), mechanisms of mountain uplift (Wang et al, 2014;Schilling et al, 2017), geoids (Liu et al, 2019), subsidence of urban surfaces (Wang et al, 2020), and volcanic activities (Wu, 2011), with abundant results. However, improving the observation accuracy of gravity values requires not only improvements in measurement resolution, but also the removal of the interference factors such as environmental factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%