2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cohesive model for fatigue failure of polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An evolution " i law for the cohesive stiffness during the reloading phase of the cyclic loading has been introduced in the cohesive failure law to generate Figure 2. Modification of the fatigue a natural degradation of the cohesive strength cohesive failure model to account for the (Maiti and Geubelle, 2005a). Figure I shows a presence of the healing agent between the comparison between the numerical and crackfaces (Maiti and Geubelle, 2005b).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evolution " i law for the cohesive stiffness during the reloading phase of the cyclic loading has been introduced in the cohesive failure law to generate Figure 2. Modification of the fatigue a natural degradation of the cohesive strength cohesive failure model to account for the (Maiti and Geubelle, 2005a). Figure I shows a presence of the healing agent between the comparison between the numerical and crackfaces (Maiti and Geubelle, 2005b).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Macaulay brackets are used to signify nonnegative value of damage evolution, and the Heaviside function H states that damage initiates at δ > δ 0 . The novel cohesive envelope determined by (1) will degrade and change its shape correspondingly associated with the damage accumulation, and this characteristic is the major difference between the current model and other CCZMs [11,12,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. For example, in [25], the combination use of (2) and the cohesive envelope of the exponential form are performed to simulate fatigue crack growth; however, this combination results in the contradictory damage evolution at δ n > δ 0 if a slightly larger value of σ f /σ max,0 is provided, and this problem can be solved by using (1).…”
Section: Cohesive Zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, these models [27,28] do not mention their applications for fatigue crack growth at the high ΔK levels in Regime III. Although the Paris-like behavior which corresponds to the moderate ΔK levels in Regime II can be predicted by using the aforementioned CCZMs [11,[22][23][24][25][26][27], this is not the advantage of CCZMs, since the Paris regime associated with SSY has already been described successfully according to the K-based models. In order to resolve the more challenging task that to simulate the high fatigue crack growth rates in Regime III of the metallic materials, a CCZM was proposed in our previous work [29] in which two damage variables were defined to represent monotonic damage and fatigue damage, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two approaches to this modelling are a cycle-by-cycle approach [9][10][11] and characterising the cyclic loading by the maximum fatigue load [12][13][14][15]. In high cycle fatigue, a cycle-by-cycle approach can be very demanding in term of computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%