2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12127-016-0195-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collision cross section and exact ion mass database of the formulation constituents polyethylene glycol 400 and polysorbate 80

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As most CCS calibration efforts have been done in the positive ionization mode and few with negatively charged ions, we utilized the negative ionization mode and nitrogen buffer gas. The mass and CCS of the calibrants are in a range from approximately m / z 300 to 1800 and 150 to 330 Å 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most CCS calibration efforts have been done in the positive ionization mode and few with negatively charged ions, we utilized the negative ionization mode and nitrogen buffer gas. The mass and CCS of the calibrants are in a range from approximately m / z 300 to 1800 and 150 to 330 Å 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the RT, CCS values are independent of the used LC conditions and are unaffected by the sample matrix. Experimental CCS values (±2% tolerance) have been proven to be robust across multiple platforms and conditions, when using the same buffer gas. ,,, CCS has demonstrated to be very useful in identifying compounds as it renders, in combination with LC and HRMS data, increasing peak capacity and selectivity in complex samples while constraining false-negative and false-positive detections . However, there is currently no empirical CCS library available; thus, on the basis of CCS, compounds discovered when applying suspect or nontarget strategies cannot be identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using CCS as an orthogonal molecular descriptor in addition to retention time and m / z offers the opportunity to further improve the identification process, increasing selectivity, reproducibility and robustness. ,, Thus, in combination with chromatography, analytes can be characterized by three orthogonal separation techniques, obtaining a retention time, a CCS value and an accurate mass for each analyte. Unlike the retention times, CCS values are independent of the used chromatographic conditions and are not affected by the sample matrices . Consequently, the experimentally determined CCS of a given analyte is a reliable parameter to support MS-based compound identification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of drift times presents some limitations for their inclusion in searchable databases, as they are instrument/conditions-dependent. In contrast, CCS has been shown as a robust molecular descriptor across multiple platforms and conditions. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%