2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A column generation approach for solving a non-temporal forest harvest model with spatial structure constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These may reduce fragmentation of old-growth forest areas and enhance biodiversity (e.g. Öhman and Eriksson 1998;Öhman 2000;Falcão and Borges 2002;Rebain and McDill 2003;Martins et al 2005;Tóth and McDill 2007;Hoganson 2006, 2008;Öhman and Wikström 2008). Other possible management goals could be to cluster harvest activities to reduce machine transportation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may reduce fragmentation of old-growth forest areas and enhance biodiversity (e.g. Öhman and Eriksson 1998;Öhman 2000;Falcão and Borges 2002;Rebain and McDill 2003;Martins et al 2005;Tóth and McDill 2007;Hoganson 2006, 2008;Öhman and Wikström 2008). Other possible management goals could be to cluster harvest activities to reduce machine transportation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we propose a Dantzig-Wolfe decompositions of the bucket model by reformulating the set defined by constraints (4) and (8). A similar decomposition of the alternative model can also be presented by reformulating the set defined by these constraints and the connectivity constraints.…”
Section: Knapsack Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Três formulações ARM básicas são descritas na literatura: a formulação path (Martins et al 1999, McDill et al 2002, Murray e Weintraub 2002, Crowe et al 2003, com um número exponencial de restrições, a formulação cluster (Martins et al 1999e 2005, McDill et al 2002, Goycoolea et al 2005, Vielma et al 2007, com um número exponencial de variáveis, e a mais recente formulação bucket (Constantino et al 2008), com um número polinomial de variáveis e restrições. Provou-se teoricamente que a formulação cluster é mais forte do que a formulação path (Goycoolea et al 2009) e a formulação bucket (Martins et al2012), ou seja, a relaxação linear da formulação cluster dá melhores majorantes do que as relaxações lineares das restantes formulações.…”
Section: Modelos Com Restrições De Clareirasunclassified