2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Pharmacokinetic and Radiologic Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Response to Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant positive correlations have been observed between parameters describing the rate or magnitude of signal enhancement and tumor pO 2 or microvascular density (24)(25)(26). Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that poor signal enhancement is correlated with poor response to radiation treatment as a consequence of hypoxia-induced radiation resistance (26)(27)(28). However, the correlations are generally weak, perhaps because the analyses were based on semiquantitative parameters derived from signal intensity curves rather than quantitative parameters calculated from Gd-DTPA concentration curves by the use of adequate pharmacokinetic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant positive correlations have been observed between parameters describing the rate or magnitude of signal enhancement and tumor pO 2 or microvascular density (24)(25)(26). Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that poor signal enhancement is correlated with poor response to radiation treatment as a consequence of hypoxia-induced radiation resistance (26)(27)(28). However, the correlations are generally weak, perhaps because the analyses were based on semiquantitative parameters derived from signal intensity curves rather than quantitative parameters calculated from Gd-DTPA concentration curves by the use of adequate pharmacokinetic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression rate correlated positively with changes in both peak and mean tumour enhancement Takayama [48] All 1.5T Tumor regression rate signifi cantly correlated to both *SI e (r = 0.37, P =.015) and **R down (r = 0.73, P < 0001). Semple [49] All 1.5T Pretherapy mean signal intensity, Signal enhancement ratio, K trans, TPE, individually correlated Yuh [45] All 1.5T Signal Intensity (5%) <2 and Tumor volume >30 cc at 2.5 to 3 weeks predicts for 8 yr local control (73% vs 100% P = 0.0006) and disease free survival (47% vs 79% P = 0.001) Zahara [47] All 1.5T Pre RT # K trans (P =0.04), $ K ep (P = 0.02), peak (, slope, maximum slope, contrast enhancement ratio correlate with tumor regression *median value for the degree of signal intensity change in all selected pixels in the tumor at 1-2 min after contrast agent injection,**ratio of the number of down sloped pixels to that of all selected pixels 3-7 min after injection, # Transfer coeffi cient of paramagnetic contrast agent from blood to tissue, $ Back Flux Rate tissues. Combining spectral information with anatomical information may facilitate investigation of prespecified ROIs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46] Tumor enhancement or an increase in signal intensity within the first two weeks of treatment are associated with better tumor regression, [47][48][49] local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. A summary of DCE studies evaluating tumor response is provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Intratumoral Heterogeneity On Dce and Therapeutic Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models have also shown promise in a variety of other clinical applications, such as renal carcinoma [258], rheumatoid arthritis [259,260], quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) [261,262], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [263], arterial occlusive disease [264] and carotid atherosclerotic plaque [191,265], hepatocellular carcinomas [266], and tumor heterogeneity analysis [57,58,267]. New fields, such as assessment of preoperative oral cancer therapy [60], pancreatic [59] and cervical cancer [167,194,216,268,269], head and neck cancers [270][271][272][273][274], and cardiac diseases [275][276][277] are also regularly explored. The Patlak plot is the simplest PK technique having been widely used in the dynamic MRI analysis.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Parametric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%