2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined radial basis function and adaptive sequential sampling method for structural reliability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, Kriging metamodel methods have obtained remarkable attention in the state-of-the-art literature. From the design of experiment (DOE) aspect of view, the strategy for constructing a Kriging model can broadly be classified into two sorts, the one is "one-shot" and the other is adaptive sampling or sequential sampling methods [26]. Literally, "one-shot" means producing enough design points before generating a Kriging model without supplementing new sample points in succeeding courses.…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Kriging metamodel methods have obtained remarkable attention in the state-of-the-art literature. From the design of experiment (DOE) aspect of view, the strategy for constructing a Kriging model can broadly be classified into two sorts, the one is "one-shot" and the other is adaptive sampling or sequential sampling methods [26]. Literally, "one-shot" means producing enough design points before generating a Kriging model without supplementing new sample points in succeeding courses.…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further constructed an objective function response surface surrogate model through Latin hypercubic sampling and optimized the design parameters for horizontal vibration reduction using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Response surface model (RSM), [14][15][16][17] radial basis function model (RBF), [18][19][20] and Kriging model [21][22][23][24][25] are frequently used surrogate models. Owing to its capacity to substantially enhance the efficiency of engineering optimization design problems, the surrogate model approach has garnered significant recognition in the aerospace and other domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is noted that most of the aforementioned active learning methods are developed based on the Kriging model, where the error at unknown points can be empirically measured by the Kriging variance. Thus, the use of these learning algorithms to other surrogate models is not directly applicable unless additional effort such as bootstrap resampling strategy [86] or fold cross-validation [87] is employed to get the prediction variance, which is a cumbersome process. To address this issue, several studies have been devoted to getting the model variance in a more effective way, among which the recently proposed Bayesian inference framework has shown promising potential [88,89].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%