2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03419-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined SDDP/Benders decomposition approach with a risk-averse surface concept for reservoir operation in long term power generation planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower layer optimization problem of the risk aversion coefficient is characterized by high dimensional order, multistage, non-linearity, and multiple constraints. To solve this type of optimization problem, researchers have proposed improved stochastic fractal search algorithm (ISFSA) (Phan et al, 2021), Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) (Heidari et al, 1971) and Discrete Differential Dynamic Planning (DDDP) (Bookstaber and McDonald, 1987;Diniz et al, 2020), etc. Among them, DDDP has the advantage of finding the optimal solution only in the locally feasible domain of state variables, which can effectively reduce the computational storage and computing time compared with other algorithms.…”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower layer optimization problem of the risk aversion coefficient is characterized by high dimensional order, multistage, non-linearity, and multiple constraints. To solve this type of optimization problem, researchers have proposed improved stochastic fractal search algorithm (ISFSA) (Phan et al, 2021), Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) (Heidari et al, 1971) and Discrete Differential Dynamic Planning (DDDP) (Bookstaber and McDonald, 1987;Diniz et al, 2020), etc. Among them, DDDP has the advantage of finding the optimal solution only in the locally feasible domain of state variables, which can effectively reduce the computational storage and computing time compared with other algorithms.…”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the hybrid approach in [15], hydropower details are considered through the entire planning horizon seen by SDDP. The use of global feasibility cuts to deal with functionality that is not explicit in the SDDP formulation has previously been applied for embedding risk measures [34], [35] in LTS model formulations. Differently from those works, we use feasibility cuts to facilitate spatial decomposition, coordinating aggregated and detailed hydropower representations within the SDDP algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although regulation does not allow residential clients to take part in the free market, the load that is represented by large industrial and commercial customers is quite relevant, and today about 30% of all energy consumed in the country is freely traded. However, the market deregulation kept some structures from the preexisting electrical system coordination, such as the price formation through computational calculations [7][8][9], which are centrally performed by the ISO and the CCEE. Thus, there is no field for the game theory application towards price formation on a short-term period-although, this theory can be applied to the pricing of bilateral contracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%