2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2003.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A common framework for nonlinear diffusion, adaptive smoothing, bilateral filtering and mean shift

Abstract: In this paper, a common framework is outlined for nonlinear diffusion, adaptive smoothing, bilateral filtering and mean shift procedure. Previously, the relationship between bilateral filtering and the nonlinear diffusion equation was explored by using a consistent adaptive smoothing formulation. However, both nonlinear diffusion and adaptive smoothing were treated as local processes applying a 3 £ 3 window at each iteration. Here, these two approaches are extended to an arbitrary window, showing their equival… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, BM3D [9] uses 8 × 8 windows at noise s.t.d below 40 and 12 × 12 windows at higher noise levels. Similarly, Bilateral filtering denoising algorithms [4] estimate a pixel as an adaptive average of its neighbors, where the neighbor weight is significantly reduced when an intensity discontinuity is observed. However, the discontinuity measure is relative to the noise level and only differences above the noise standard deviation actually reduce the neighbor weight.…”
Section: Window Size and Noise Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, BM3D [9] uses 8 × 8 windows at noise s.t.d below 40 and 12 × 12 windows at higher noise levels. Similarly, Bilateral filtering denoising algorithms [4] estimate a pixel as an adaptive average of its neighbors, where the neighbor weight is significantly reduced when an intensity discontinuity is observed. However, the discontinuity measure is relative to the noise level and only differences above the noise standard deviation actually reduce the neighbor weight.…”
Section: Window Size and Noise Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our current methodology is an extension of this technique we will present it in detail in Section 3. For a study of the connection between anisotropic diffusion, adaptive smoothing and bilateral filtering, see [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that there exist methods such as adaptive filtering [4], [12] in which the weights in Equation 1 are obtained as w (2) (x j , y j ) = g(|∇I(x j , y j )|). These methods place more importance on the lower-gradient pixels of the neighborhood, but do not exploit level curve relationships in the way we do, and the choice of the weighting function does not have the geometric interpretation that exists in our technique.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%