2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compact finite difference scheme for variable order subdiffusion equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scientific journal considers manuscripts only if accuracy and convergence of numerical solutions are established by discussion of results on multiple grids. Recently, there have been many research studies on the second-order convergence schemes for parabolictype partial differential equations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. To demonstrate the second-order convergence, some authors [1][2][3] showed the convergence by refining the spatial and temporal steps at the same time; some authors in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] showed the convergence by refining the spatial and temporal steps separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scientific journal considers manuscripts only if accuracy and convergence of numerical solutions are established by discussion of results on multiple grids. Recently, there have been many research studies on the second-order convergence schemes for parabolictype partial differential equations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. To demonstrate the second-order convergence, some authors [1][2][3] showed the convergence by refining the spatial and temporal steps at the same time; some authors in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] showed the convergence by refining the spatial and temporal steps separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be pointed out that there are various numerical methods in the numerical analysis for the proposed equations. For the fractional diffusion equation, Zhang et al 32 used the time‐discrete scheme based on the finite difference method, Hajipour et al 33 applied the Chebyshev wavelet approach for solving multiterm VO time‐fractional diffusion‐wave equation, Cao et al 34 provided the compact finite difference operator for solving VO‐fractional reaction–diffusion equation. For fractional subdiffusion equations, Yu et al 35 applied the compact finite difference scheme for VO‐fractional subdiffusion equations, Yaseen et al 24 proposed the generalized Laguerre spectral Petrov–Galerkin method, Ghaffari and Ghoreishi 36 proposed a cubic trigonometric B‐spline collocation approach, and so forth (see References 22,37‐39).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem 2: VO‐fractional subdiffusion equation: 34 U(x,t)t=𝒟0,t1ν(x,t)κ12U(x,t)x2κ2U(x,t)+𝒢(x,t,U),(x,t)(0,1)×(0,1], with initial and boundary conditions frakturUfalse(x,0false)=φfalse(xfalse),14.22636ptxfalse[0,1false],0emfrakturUfalse(0,tfalse)=ω0false(tfalse),14.22636ptfrakturUfalse(1,tfalse)=ω1false(tfalse),14.22636pttfalse[0,1false],0em where κ1,κ2>0 are the reaction terms and 𝒟0,tν(x,t) is the VO Caputo fractional derivative of order 0<νminν(x,t)νmax<1...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [11], Cao et al presented a Crank-Nicolson-type compact finite-difference scheme with the second-order temporal accuracy and the fourth-order spatial accuracy. Shen [34] considered the variable-order time-fractional diffusion equation, and discussed the stability, convergence, and solvability of the numerical scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%