“…This may be due to strong surface impedance dependence at oblique incidence on the plane and polarization. However, it can also be found that the shifts of the frequency response with the change O p e r a t i n g b a n d Dual [6] 2.208 0 × 2.208 0 3.4, 0.5 mm Single Dual [7] 0.104 0 × 0.104 0 4.4, 1.6 mm Single Dual [8] 0.081 0 × 0.081 0 2.65, 1.5 mm Single Dual [9] 0.062 0 × 0.062 0 3.66, 0.254 mm Single Single [10] 0.172 0 × 0.172 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Single [11] 0.095 0 × 0.095 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Dual [12] 0.061 0 × 0.061 0 2.65, 1 mm Dual Single [13] 0.088 0 × 0.088 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Dual Single [14] 0 of the incident angle are opposite for transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) incidences. It is further observed from Figure 2 that the variation in the amplitude levels (i.e., the resonance bandwidth) in TM mode increases with increase in the angle of incidence, whereas in TE mode, it is falling rapidly as the angle of incidence increases.…”