2018
DOI: 10.1109/map.2018.2818003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compact Ultrawideband Reflector Antenna: Using a Wide-Band Omnidirectional Antenna with a Mechanically Steerable Endfire Beam to Illuminate a Half-Cut Paraboloid Reflector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the low profile and size compactness are important features for actual applications. e antennas with a flat ground plane or reflector are low profile at the expense of a large planar dimension [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. e modified biconical antenna [10] without a flat ground plane can overcome the bulky ground plane.…”
Section: Antenna Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the low profile and size compactness are important features for actual applications. e antennas with a flat ground plane or reflector are low profile at the expense of a large planar dimension [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. e modified biconical antenna [10] without a flat ground plane can overcome the bulky ground plane.…”
Section: Antenna Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 17, the pulse distortion in E-plane in the upward direction was observed around 6 GHz and became less severe afterward. e phenomenon could be attributed [6] 0.88λ L × 0.88λ L × 0.216λ L 2.20-6.50 98.85 7.0-10.0 [7] 0.98λ L × 0.98λ L × 0.383λ L 1.66-11.00 147.55 8.7-18.9 [8] 0.67λ L × 0.67λ L × 0.050λ L 2.50-24.00 162.26 3.5-10.0 [9] 0.35λ L × 0.35λ L × 0.242λ L 0.58-1.75 100.43 3.6-5.5 [10] 0.29λ L × 0.29λ L × 0.270λ L 1.50-41.00 185.88 1.2-4.7 [11] 0.42λ L × 0.42λ L × 0.013λ L 2.50-12.0 131.03 2.0-6.0 [12] 0.21λ L × 0.29λ L × 0.004λ L 3.10-10.60 109.49 -1.0-3.0 [13] 0.21λ L × 0.25λ L × 0.013λ L 2.38-11.80 132.86 2.8-5.6 [14] 0.19λ L × 0.27λ L × 0.002λ L 2.85-11.85 122.45 − 1.2-3.2 [15] 0.47λ L × 0.53λ L × 0.004λ L 3.10-10.60 109.49 2.0-5.5 [16] 0.28λ L × 0.30λ L × 0.015λ L 2.80-12.00 124.32 4.0-5.0 [17] 0.24λ L × 0.36λ L × 0.015λ L 2.90-10.80 115.33 1.00-4.25 [18] 0.46λ L × 0.43λ L × 0.019λ L 3.50-11.70 107.89 4.33-6.00 [19] 1. to the induction of electric fields in the area between the top of the CDM and the elliptical ring. In Figure 18, the pulse distortion in E-plane in the downward direction became worse beyond 6.5 GHz as the electric fields in the area between the feeding point and the connector were induced.…”
Section: Antenna Performance For Uwb Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in order to evaluate the antenna positions and modules it is desired to measure standard wideband antennas. For this purpose, conical monopole antennas [42], [43] were used to characterize the antenna positions in a wide frequency range from 0.8 to 6 GHz. The cone angles were adapted to match the antenna impedances to the 50 Ohm feed cable impedances.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%