2017 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/sice.2017.8105748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A companion robot for daily care of elders based on homeostasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2). Mubin and colleagues [73] investigated the use of Pepper and Nao in public spaces, and a range of studies have evaluated Pepper's social acceptability in shopping malls, elderly care homes, remote classrooms, and as a customer service employee in a hotel lobby [24,[74][75][76]. While in these contexts a humanoid robot may be valuable, other developers have taken a different approach with the MiRo robot (Consequential Robotics).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 2). Mubin and colleagues [73] investigated the use of Pepper and Nao in public spaces, and a range of studies have evaluated Pepper's social acceptability in shopping malls, elderly care homes, remote classrooms, and as a customer service employee in a hotel lobby [24,[74][75][76]. While in these contexts a humanoid robot may be valuable, other developers have taken a different approach with the MiRo robot (Consequential Robotics).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies only reported the self-rated questionnaire results [45] or user opinions [55]. There are also studies which do not include any evaluation, and only a short discussion regarding the learned policy [53,57,100,101] The cumulative collected reward over time is the most commonly used evaluation method. As learning progresses, the frequency of negative rewards is expected to decrease and positive rewards are expected to increase.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q-learning, along with its different variations, is the most commonly used RL method in social robotics. The studies using Q-learning are [ 3 , 13 , 34 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. These comprise studies using standard Q-learning [ 3 , 54 , 55 , 58 , 60 , 62 ], studies modify Q-learning for dealing with delayed reward [ 52 ], tuning the parameters for Q-learning such as [ 13 , 34 , 52 ], dealing with decreasing human feedback over time [ 52 ], comparing their proposed algorithm with Q-learning [ 33 , 49 , 61 , 63 , 64 ], variation of Q-learning called Object Q-learning [ 64 , 65 , 66 ], combining Q-learning with fuzzy inference [ 67 ], SARSA [ 68 , 69 ], TD( ) [ 70 ], MAXQ [ 33 , 71 , 72 ], R-learning [ 32 ], and Deep Q-learning [ 35 , 36 , 73 , 74 ].…”
Section: Categorization Of Rl Approaches In Social Robotics Based mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the social robot Pepper, 7 another humanoid robot, also developed by Aldebaran, has been used to adapt its behavior to serve and meet the requirements of the elderly, while simultaneously maintaining its own system [50].…”
Section: General Purpose Social Robots Used For the Elderlymentioning
confidence: 99%