2018
DOI: 10.1080/1941126x.2018.1521089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of electronic resources access problems at two university libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resources are technological means that transmit information to the future and include all traditional and non-traditional information, such as printed materials such as books, pamphlets, and reports, and non-traditional information such as visual and audio materials, databases, e-books, and electronic journals, and the information resources are divided into two types: Documentary sources such as primary sources, secondary sources, and third-degree sources. Nondocumentary sources such as official sources that contain informative, advisory, and advisory information, and informal sources known as personal sources, which are obtained through dialogues, conferences, seminars, and meetings (Brett, 2018).…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resources are technological means that transmit information to the future and include all traditional and non-traditional information, such as printed materials such as books, pamphlets, and reports, and non-traditional information such as visual and audio materials, databases, e-books, and electronic journals, and the information resources are divided into two types: Documentary sources such as primary sources, secondary sources, and third-degree sources. Nondocumentary sources such as official sources that contain informative, advisory, and advisory information, and informal sources known as personal sources, which are obtained through dialogues, conferences, seminars, and meetings (Brett, 2018).…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Brett at the University of Houston, Lowry at The University of Alabama, and Gould and Brett at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Texas A&M University respectively, examined troubleshooting data in a somewhat different light, wherein rates of access problems across multiple research institutions were used to form a comparative analysis in three different studies. 8 Brett first concluded that it was indeed possible to perform a comparative analysis between institutions when troubleshooting data is analyzed, and illuminated similarities and differences in a comparison between two universities, highlighting where improvements could be made to the University of Houston's services. For example, Brett discovered that the University of Houston had more tickets concerning problems with EZProxy and IP addresses than the University of Maryland, College Park.…”
Section: Benefits To Mining Troubleshooting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brett at the University of Houston replicated the process and vocabulary described by Goldfinger and Hemhauser to explore whether the same vocabulary could be used at different institutions. 11 Brett concluded that the vocabulary could be transferable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%