2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00573-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of forest dynamics in the Swiss Alps and the Colorado Front Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ForClim has evolved from a simulator of forests in the Swiss Alps to a general model that is applicable to temperate forests of central Europe (Bugmann and Cramer 1998), eastern North America (Bugmann and Solomon 1995), the Pacific Northwest of the US (Bugmann and Solomon 2000), northeastern China (Shao et al 2001) and (2000) Northeastern China 19 X. Yan X. Yan Shao et al (2001) the Colorado Front Range of the Rocky Mountains (Bugmann 2001b). ForClim is not based on a hybrid approach between physiology-based modules for plant growth (which would feature a ''mechanistic'' treatment of photosynthesis and respiration) and a more traditional approach for handling tree demography (e.g., Friend et al 1997;Lexer et al 2001).…”
Section: Forest Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ForClim has evolved from a simulator of forests in the Swiss Alps to a general model that is applicable to temperate forests of central Europe (Bugmann and Cramer 1998), eastern North America (Bugmann and Solomon 1995), the Pacific Northwest of the US (Bugmann and Solomon 2000), northeastern China (Shao et al 2001) and (2000) Northeastern China 19 X. Yan X. Yan Shao et al (2001) the Colorado Front Range of the Rocky Mountains (Bugmann 2001b). ForClim is not based on a hybrid approach between physiology-based modules for plant growth (which would feature a ''mechanistic'' treatment of photosynthesis and respiration) and a more traditional approach for handling tree demography (e.g., Friend et al 1997;Lexer et al 2001).…”
Section: Forest Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During its construction, special emphasis was placed on developing a model with a minimum number of ecological assumptions (Bugmann 1996). The applicability of ForClim was successfully extended from the Swiss Alps to other climatic regions through several model refinements (Bugmann and Cramer 1998;Solomon 1995, 2000;Bugmann 2001;Shao et al 2001). A detailed description of ForClim can be found in Bugmann (1996), and the latest version of ForClim, V.2.9.3, is documented in Risch et al (2005).…”
Section: The Forclim Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of ForClim was successfully extended from the Swiss Alps to other forests of central Europe (Bugmann and Cramer, 1998), to forests of eastern North America (Bugmann and Solomon, 1995), the Pacific Northwest of the United States (Bugmann and Solomon, 2000), the Rocky Mountains (Bugmann, 2001a) and to the Northeast of China (Shao et al, 2001) through different model modifications.…”
Section: The Patch Model Forclimmentioning
confidence: 99%