2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-006-0142-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the establishment submodel of a forest patch model to assess the long-term protective effect of mountain forests

Abstract: Simulation models such as forest patch models can be used to forecast the development of forest structural attributes over time. However, predictions of such models with respect to the impact of forest dynamics on the long-term protective effect of mountain forests may be of limited accuracy where tree regeneration is simulated with little detail. For this reason, we improved the establishment submodel of the ForClim forest patch model by implementing a more detailed representation of tree regeneration. Our re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For time scales of a few decades, the model predicted stock dynamics with a quantitative bias less than 7% after 50 years in a forest managed with a selection system. This bias is within the lower range of the order of magnitude reported for comparable models (Wehrli et al, 2007;Pacala et al, 1996;Seidl et al, 2005;Didion et al, 2009). However, the number of small trees was overestimated in most stands.…”
Section: The Evaludation Process Revealed Model Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For time scales of a few decades, the model predicted stock dynamics with a quantitative bias less than 7% after 50 years in a forest managed with a selection system. This bias is within the lower range of the order of magnitude reported for comparable models (Wehrli et al, 2007;Pacala et al, 1996;Seidl et al, 2005;Didion et al, 2009). However, the number of small trees was overestimated in most stands.…”
Section: The Evaludation Process Revealed Model Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…For example, in forest dynamics models, it is common to compare the predictions of tree community composition to potential natural vegetation types (Bugmann, 1996;Lexer and Honninger, 2001;Botkin, 1993) or old growth forest plots (Pacala et al, 1996;Ruger et al, 2007), or to use historical records of forest inventories over several decades to compare the evolution of predicted and observed capital (e.g., basal area) (Wehrli et al, 2005;Wehrli et al, 2007) and/or distributions of trees in diameter classes (Seidl et al, 2005;Didion et al, 2009;Wehrli et al, 2005;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As trees that grow very slowly are subject to enhanced mortality, they die within a short time. This severe limitation resulted in overestimating strongly mature tree mortality rates in dense stands (Wehrli et al 2005), especially in many mountain forests (Ott et al 1997;Wehrli et al 2007). Previous studies also emphasized the need for replacing the parabolic height-diameter function with an asymptotic one, because maximum height is only reached when tree diameter approaches infinity, thus avoiding large trees to become subject to an excessive growth-related mortality rate (Lindner et al 1997;Risch et al 2005;Wehrli et al 2007).…”
Section: Model Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Wehrli et al (2007), for instance, introduced a lumped, site-specific ordinal factor for browsing intensity and occurrence in FORCLIM, which in combination with the respective susceptibility parameter results in browsing impact. For white-tailed deer browsing in an Eastern North American riparian hardwood forest, Seagle and Liang (2001) used a more detailed two-stage approach to modelling browsing probability, accounting for both density of tree regeneration (considering seedlings and saplings less than 2 cm diameter) and an ungulate density index.…”
Section: Occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…small saplings are not as resistant to browsing as taller trees. Another important interaction for modelling browsing impacts exists with light availability and tree growth, as shading directly affects sapling growth and thus the time needed for trees to outgrow highly vulnerable development stages (Wehrli et al, 2007). In this regard Weisberg et al (2005: HUNGER) presented an approach that models the interaction of light availability and browsing impact.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%