1980
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90108-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of intrusion of incisor teeth achieved in adults and children according to facial type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
13

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…23 The main determining factor of overbite in patients with an elongated face is inferior facial height, whereas, in short-faced patients, the major influence on overbite is inferior dentoalveolar morphology. Normal overbite in individuals with an elongated face may be maintained by limited inferior dentoalveolar compensation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The main determining factor of overbite in patients with an elongated face is inferior facial height, whereas, in short-faced patients, the major influence on overbite is inferior dentoalveolar morphology. Normal overbite in individuals with an elongated face may be maintained by limited inferior dentoalveolar compensation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The Burstone intrusion arch does not require a cinch, since the incisor inclination can be controlled by the contact point of the incisor tie. 6 Most of the published clinical studies about these two techniques concerned the extent of root resorption [8][9][10][11] or their side effects on the posterior part of the dentition. [12][13] The force magnitude 14 and the application point of the intrusive force 15 were also clinically evaluated for the segmented arch technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La falta de asociación entre el biotipo facial y la sobremordida encontrada en el presente estudio es coherente con los resultados presentados por Otto y col. (34), quienes encontraron que el biotipo facial no influencia la extensión de la intrusión de los incisivos. Claro y col. (35) evaluaron la asociación entre la sobremordida y el patrón de crecimiento craneofacial, y no encontrando relación de dependencia entre el incremento de la sobremordida y el patrón de crecimiento braquifacial, tampoco entre la mordida abierta y el patrón de crecimiento dolicofacial.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified