1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01315058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of measles virus RNA by oligonucleotide fingerprinting

Abstract: Isolates from two cases of acute measles, one case of acute measles encephalitis and three patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis were compared. This comparison was based upon the electrophoretic analysis of T1 oligonucleotides from single-stranded, full-length RNA isolated from cytoplasmic nucleocapsids. Although all viruses have oligonucleotides in common, each isolate generated a unique pattern of oligonucleotides. However, no group of oligonucleotides was observed which would allow a differentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is assumed to be due to the secondary structure of the oligonucleotides affecting the relative efficiency of the kinase reaction. Similar observations have been noted when the genomes of several RNA viruses were analysed by this method (Frisby, 1977;Stephenson & ter Meulen, 1982). However, these variations in intensity were judged not to affect the validity of the conclusions since the fingerprint patterns were reproducible in repeated analyses of the same RNA sample and for different RNA preparations from the same virus stock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This is assumed to be due to the secondary structure of the oligonucleotides affecting the relative efficiency of the kinase reaction. Similar observations have been noted when the genomes of several RNA viruses were analysed by this method (Frisby, 1977;Stephenson & ter Meulen, 1982). However, these variations in intensity were judged not to affect the validity of the conclusions since the fingerprint patterns were reproducible in repeated analyses of the same RNA sample and for different RNA preparations from the same virus stock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We assumed this was due to formation of secondary structures among some of the T1-digested oligonucleotides, which affected the relative efficiency of the kinase reaction. Similar observations have been noted for other RNA viruses (Frisby 1977, Stephenson & Ter Meulen 1982, Kamahora et al 1985, Kusters et al 1987. The pres- ence of several small genetic subpopulations (a result of the high mutation rate of RNA viruses) in addition to the dominant population (quasispecies) may also be a factor (Steinhauer et al 1989b).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The high-molecularweight genome-length RNA was accompanied by heterogeneous subgenomic RNA (Fig. 3, lanes A and B), which was also observed in purified preparations of genomic RNA of measles virus (20,31) unless removed by extensive gradient centrifugation, nuclease treatment, or both (3). A second class of intracellular RNA consisted of monocistronic RNA which migrated faster than the 18S ribosomal RNA marker (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To rule out a possible defect in the protein-coding function of the M cistron in this clone, the M cistron was excised from pcD-PM5d by digestion with Sall and BamHI and inserted into an in vitro expression vector which contained promoters derived from bacteriophages SP6 and T7 (pGEM-3) (Promega Biotec). The resulting clone, pSP6-PM5d-Aa, contained the complete M gene preceded by 31 30 ,ug of cloned DNA as previously described (35). At 30 h posttransfection, cells were starved for 30 min in methionine-free Eagle minimal essential medium and labeled with 30 ,uCi of [35S]methionine per culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%