2014
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of moral principles and behavioral norms in eight ethical codes relevant to health sciences librarianship, medical informatics, and the health professions

Abstract: The shared core of behavioral norms among these professions, all grounded in core moral principles, point to many opportunities for building effective interprofessional communication and collaboration regarding the development, management, and use of health information resources and technologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ethical use of information based on principles such as beneficence, autonomy and justice can favor the construction of effective interprofessional communication and collaboration, as well as the management and use of information and technology resources in health (15) . Intellectual respect and poor scientific behavior have been discussed, especially in the academic context, as well as policies for control, in countries from the European Union and the US (16) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethical use of information based on principles such as beneficence, autonomy and justice can favor the construction of effective interprofessional communication and collaboration, as well as the management and use of information and technology resources in health (15) . Intellectual respect and poor scientific behavior have been discussed, especially in the academic context, as well as policies for control, in countries from the European Union and the US (16) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key considerations of research ethics committees and institutional review boards is to ensure the safety of participants by evaluating the likely risks (ensuring “non-maleficence”) and benefits (ensuring “beneficence”) of research participation (Byrd & Winkelstein, 2014). When applying for ethical clearance, the researcher needs to state his or her beliefs about the possible risks and benefits for participants and how the risks will be minimized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the certification solution proposed here is to ensure that appropriate ethical knowledge and understanding is adhered to by HIPs. To engage in professional and technical activities without having the appropriate ethical competence amounts to a violation of the Principle of Fidelity and constitutes malfeasance of duty 21 . Technical proficiency is no guarantee that anyone would use the knowledge, products, or services that are at his/her disposal in an ethically appropriate manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%