“…Previous investigations of inter-rater agreement have focused on uroflow patterns, with findings ranging from almost perfect agreement if assessment is limited to normal vs abnormal [7] to moderate or poor agreement if a more detailed description of the uroflow curve is required (e.g. normal, tower, plateau, staccato, or interrupted) [8,9]. A recent study suggested that patterning software might improve inter-rater agreement; however, there was no consensus (gold standard) diagnosis for the studies used in that analysis [10].…”