2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2014.6968245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of remote sensing image classification techniques

Abstract: In this paper, we have compared the accuracy of four supervised classification as Mahalanobis, Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), Minimum distance and Parallelepiped classification with remote sensing Landsat images of different time period and sensors. We have used Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS), Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Thematic Mapper+ (ETM+) images of 1972, 1998 and 2013 respectively of Jaipur district, Rajasthan, India. Accuracy has been calculated using Producer accuracy, User accurac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Population_Size=D1.element count 5. Apply optimal solution(D1) 6 Algorithm 1 describes the processing of raw data in which it utilizes a fitness function to drop or select data for processing. The selection of the threshold is done on the basis of the data passed to the optimization function.…”
Section: Existing Work Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Population_Size=D1.element count 5. Apply optimal solution(D1) 6 Algorithm 1 describes the processing of raw data in which it utilizes a fitness function to drop or select data for processing. The selection of the threshold is done on the basis of the data passed to the optimization function.…”
Section: Existing Work Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fulfil these demands, the satellite images aimed at an enhanced spatial resolution at higher frequency range, though, this doesnassure improved land cover. The usage of image classification techniques is considered as a significant factor for improved accuracy [6]. Figure 1 shows a satellite image which contains varios segments like crop, barren etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma gama de classificadores, aplicados à classificação supervisionada pixel a pixel, tem sido amplamente empregada na classificação de imagens remotamente situadas, e os classificadores Mahalanobis, "maximum likelihood", "minimum distance" e "parellelepiped" têm sido os mais utilizados (Sisodia et al, 2014), todos de natureza paramétrica. Neste contexto, muitos trabalhos têm avaliado a acurácia desses classificadores, para a definição de áreas homogêneas a partir de imagens de resolução espacial moderada (Hagner & Reese, 2007;Prishchepov et al, 2012;Laurin et al, 2013;Jia et al, 2014;Ganasri & Dwarakish, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…With the same fractional abundance images as the input, the different subpixel mapping algorithms obtained different performances and obtained different subpixel mapping results. The reference classification image used to verify the performance of the different subpixel mapping results was obtained by classification of the original high-resolution images by a hard classification method, such as a support vector machine (SVM) [48] or the minimum distance hard classification algorithm [49], which were implemented in ENVI software. For the real hyperspectral image, the low-resolution (LR) hyperspectral image was collected with a Nuance NIR imaging spectrometer, and the high-resolution (HR) image was taken by a digital camera for the same area at the same time.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%