2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Low Altitude Photogrammetric Surveys

Abstract: Comparing photogrammetric performances of four user-grade unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is the main aim of this paper. This study investigates what is the more suitable UAS for specific applications considering the required scale factor, such as for architectural, environmental and restoration purposes. Some photogrammetric surveys were conducted in a 5 ha area using a Phantom 4 Adv, Mavic 2 Pro, Mavic Air 2 and Mavic Mini 2. These unmanned aircrafts are commercial systems used mainly by private professional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to consistently process the images with a high accuracy, 10 permanent ground control points (GCP) were established. The photogrammetric process needs the support of control points to be able to scale and to georeference the model [ 33 ]. Most of the GCPs were placed alongside the shoreline, where the accuracy is most crucial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to consistently process the images with a high accuracy, 10 permanent ground control points (GCP) were established. The photogrammetric process needs the support of control points to be able to scale and to georeference the model [ 33 ]. Most of the GCPs were placed alongside the shoreline, where the accuracy is most crucial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In locations with GCP boundaries, changing altitude or camera types has no discernible impact on the accuracy of the final DEMs. Plans and sections that don't have a lot of detail can benefit from accurate surveys done by low AGL missions (Mugnai & Tucci, 2022). Summary of the most recent articles is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Flying Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cada hito fue delimitado por sus coordenadas que fueron medidas con el equipo GNSS estático, el cual se conecta por una red satelital (Correa, 2018) y por medio de un aparato receptor (drone) de información se obtuvieron las coordenadas en tiempo real (Agüero et al, 2018). Fase II: Vuelos fotogramétricos en la zona de estudio Delimitado los puntos de control en la zona de estudio, se elaboró un plan de vuelo que fue llevado a cabo mediante el uso del drone Dji Mavic 2 Pro (González et al, 2019), este posee cámara fotográfica y de videos que sirve para capturar imágenes áreas (Crucil et al, 2022;Rivera, 2020), estos equipos de drones pueden tener un alcance inimaginable para muchas actividades (Oniga et al, 2022) y son la manera más eficaz, económica y precisa de obtener imágenes de alta calidad (Cienciała et al, 2022;Mugnai & Tucci, 2022;Santamaría & Sanz, 2011). Elaborado el plan de vuelo, se utilizó la aplicación del software Pix4D capture para dispositivos móviles (Barbasiewicz et al, 2018), instalados previamente en el dispositivo móvil manejado en campo, esta aplicación tiene una vista satelital que permitió delimitar los vuelos efectuados en noviembre 2020, abril y septiembre del 2021.…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified