2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of water application and energy consumption at the irrigated field level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence of the empirical and theoretical literature review suggest that when traditional surface (furrow) systems are replaced by sprinkler and drip irrigation, water abstraction (use) is reduced in a significant number of studies, among others in: Jackson et al 2010;López-Gunn et al 2012;García-Mollá et al 2013;Soto-García et al 2013;Graveline et al 2013;Heumesser et al 2012;Törnqvist and Jarsjö 2012;Peterson and Ding 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evidence of the empirical and theoretical literature review suggest that when traditional surface (furrow) systems are replaced by sprinkler and drip irrigation, water abstraction (use) is reduced in a significant number of studies, among others in: Jackson et al 2010;López-Gunn et al 2012;García-Mollá et al 2013;Soto-García et al 2013;Graveline et al 2013;Heumesser et al 2012;Törnqvist and Jarsjö 2012;Peterson and Ding 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also observed a four-fold increase in management, operation and maintenance costs than before modernization mainly due to energy costs, as well as an improvement in the apparent economic productivity as in Lecina et al (2010). Jackson et al (2010) analysed two different irrigation areas in Australia after the conversion of flood irrigation systems into pressurized systems. The results showed a 10%-66% reduction in water use, but as much as a 163% increase in energy consumption in the area irrigated by surface irrigation systems.…”
Section: Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to invest in irrigation technology traditionally depends on the water conservation benefits of the new technologies, and the costs associated with implementing the technology change (Qureshi et al, 2001;Pratt Water, 2004;Mackinnon et al, 2009). Increasing concerns about energy dependency and levels of GHG emissions (Zillman et al, 2008;Jackson et al, 2010) have been largely ignored in irrigation technology adoption decisions. Analysis of trade-offs is critical to ensuring that the economic efficiency of agricultural production is maintained, while environmental impacts are minimized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La comparación de estos resultados, sobre riegos de aguas superficiales en el Guadalquivir, con los obtenidos por los trabajos efectuados en aguas subterráneas en Murcia (Gómez Espín, 1997), no es contradictoria. De hecho, estudios efectuados en Australia (Jackson et al, 2010) concluyen que es frecuente obtener una reducción de consumo energético en los regadíos de aguas subterráneas, mientras que en zonas abastecidas por aguas superficiales la presurización trae consigo un incremento de los costes energéticos y por ende, los del riego. En estos casos llegan a recomendar centrar los esfuerzos en la mejora de los sistemas de riego por gravedad, evitando la presurización de la red.…”
Section: Los Efectos De La Presurización De Los Sistemas De Riegounclassified
“…Son las comunidades de regantes con aguas superficiales en las que se produce un aumento de las tarifas del riego por unidad de superficie, esto es debido a que antes de la modernización los precios del riego eran más bajos, al no tener costes energéticos significativos para la obtención del recurso. Se observa por tanto, un impacto diferente entre aguas superficiales y subterráneas, como ha detectado Jackson (2010).…”
Section: Iv5 Cambios En Las Tarifas Y Costes Del Recursounclassified