2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, R&D activities are continuously focused on developing new materials for AM, so the variety is constantly increasing. Optimal usage and exploitation of materials with lower production scraps are the potential benefits of AM [98]. Better process reliability and operator knowledge are the challenges for future improvements within the sustainability framework.…”
Section: E62 Processes For Metals: Am Processes For Metals Include mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, R&D activities are continuously focused on developing new materials for AM, so the variety is constantly increasing. Optimal usage and exploitation of materials with lower production scraps are the potential benefits of AM [98]. Better process reliability and operator knowledge are the challenges for future improvements within the sustainability framework.…”
Section: E62 Processes For Metals: Am Processes For Metals Include mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary-tosecondary energy conversion efficiency of 0.38 was Fig. 5 Form defect of the holes in the ID 6 sample (nominal geometry indicated with a red-dashed line) considered [33]. Moreover, unless otherwise specified, a ± 10% range of variation was assumed for the input data collected from the literature to consider data uncertainty [30].…”
Section: Cumulative Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purchase costs of the incoming feedstock material (i.e., the metal powder for the EBM machine) was quantified as 175 € per kg of Ti-6Al-4V powder, according to Ingarao and Priarone [33]. This cost, which is driven by market rules, was assumed to vary within a ± 10% range, in order to account for market fluctuations.…”
Section: Direct Materials Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wire arc additive manufacturing Le, Paris [7] Cradle to gate Lightweight part Ti-6Al-4V Machining EBM Priarone et al [18] Cradle to grave Mechanical part Ti-6Al-4V CNC lathe EBM Ingarao, Priarone [26] Cradle to grave Mechanical part Ti-6Al-4V Turning EBM…”
Section: Hot Rolling and Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%