2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
228
0
14

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
228
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…linear discriminant analysis, linear regression, logit, probit, tobit and binary tree) "are reported to have a lack of accuracy [in this field]". In addition, the current approaches for residential real estate risk evaluation are usually limited by: (1) lack of necessary data (Lopez, Saidenberg 2000); (2) lack of rationality in the way trade-offs between criteria are calculated (Ferreira et al 2012); and (3) the need to make subjectivity explicit in the decision making process (Santos et al 2002) (for further discussion, see also Wang et al 2011).…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Real Estate Investments and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…linear discriminant analysis, linear regression, logit, probit, tobit and binary tree) "are reported to have a lack of accuracy [in this field]". In addition, the current approaches for residential real estate risk evaluation are usually limited by: (1) lack of necessary data (Lopez, Saidenberg 2000); (2) lack of rationality in the way trade-offs between criteria are calculated (Ferreira et al 2012); and (3) the need to make subjectivity explicit in the decision making process (Santos et al 2002) (for further discussion, see also Wang et al 2011).…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Real Estate Investments and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of proposed model, other method for credit scoring is employed. The result of [27] for comparing common and popular methods of ensemblebagging, boosting and stacking-with the result of model, is also presented. It is obvious that the proposed hybrid ensemble model has better performance.…”
Section: Fusion Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to ordinary machine learning approaches that try to learn one hypothesis from training data, ensemble methods try to construct a set of hypotheses and combine them to use [27]. This method is used to improve the performance and accuracy of classification task.…”
Section: Overview Of Ensemble Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the many comparative studies carried out (Baesens et al 2003, Huang et al 2004, Xiao et al 2006, Wang et al 2011, it is not possible to claim the superiority of a method over other competing algorithms regardless of data characteristics. For instance, noisy samples, missing values, skewed class distribution and attribute relevance may significantly affect the success of most prediction models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%