2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-020-09408-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Assessment of the Methods-of-Moments for Estimating the Correlation Length of One-Dimensional Random Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To exclude possible intrinsic HS-AFM noise, the average ACF plot was fitted starting at lag 1 because the autocorrelation coefficient at lag 1 could be computed mostly from intrinsic noise. Furthermore, given the fact that autocorrelation coefficients become less reliable as the time-lag increases, only the coefficients above a threshold of 95% confidence interval were fitted (Christodoulou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Estimation Of Decay Times From Acfs In Hs-afm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exclude possible intrinsic HS-AFM noise, the average ACF plot was fitted starting at lag 1 because the autocorrelation coefficient at lag 1 could be computed mostly from intrinsic noise. Furthermore, given the fact that autocorrelation coefficients become less reliable as the time-lag increases, only the coefficients above a threshold of 95% confidence interval were fitted (Christodoulou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Estimation Of Decay Times From Acfs In Hs-afm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation length θ for clay may be taken 0.20m (see e.g., Pantelidis and Christodoulou [30]; in the paper in question, the θ value of two clay fields in Cyprus was calculated using the more convenient Fluctuation Function Method. A comparative assessment of the methods-of-moments for estimating the correlation length of one-dimensional random fields can be found in [31]). For a probability of failure PF = 0.0001, the minimum safety factor F PF is estimated 2.3.…”
Section: The Optimal Safety Factor Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, small correlation lengths, i.e., more spatially variable soils, require higher safety factor for any given desired probability of failure and vice versa. of one-dimensional random fields can be found in [31]). For a probability of failure PF = 0.0001, the minimum safety factor FPF is estimated 2.3.…”
Section: The Optimal Safety Factor Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such analyses have previously been executed in the field of geosciences. In (Christodoulou et al, 2021), the influence of the sampling domain length and the sampling interval on the correlation length has been investigated. Here it was found that the domain length strongly affects the results from the estimation of the correlation length, where larger domains improve the estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%