2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-08042-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of tree-based predictive models to estimate geopolymer concrete compressive strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compressive strength is critical as the primary mechanical index used to evaluate the GMS performance [ 64 , 69 ]. The changes in the compressive strength of the GMS samples produced with different GBFS contents are indicated in Figure 8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressive strength is critical as the primary mechanical index used to evaluate the GMS performance [ 64 , 69 ]. The changes in the compressive strength of the GMS samples produced with different GBFS contents are indicated in Figure 8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning algorithms [10,31,32] Using machine learning algorithms, such as decision trees [33], random forests [34], neural networks [35], etc., the training of this model requires the input of relevant data of influencing factors and the characteristic data of known materials. Through the input of a large number of data sets, the model can predict the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete [36,37].…”
Section: Prediction Methods Detailed Approach Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study demonstrated that GEP exhibited superior performance in predicting the splitting tensile strength compared to other approaches. Nguyen et al [19] used RF, decision trees (DTs), and XGBoost for the prediction of CS on fly-ash-based polymer concrete and concluded that the XGBoost model outperformed the other two models. In a study by Gupta et al [20], the optimal proportions of concrete mixes were determined using the Gaussian process, M5P model, random forest (RF), and random tree (RT) techniques and different applied models were evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%