A Comparative Evaluation of Cancer Classification via TP53 Gene Mutations Using Machin Learning

Abstract

Objective: Cancer is one of the horrendous diseases. Classifying cancer is founded on identifying cancer-causing mutations in gene sequences. Although genetic analysis can predict certain types of cancer, there is currently no effective method for predicting cancers. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to predict the cancer types and to find a data mining technique that uses two different machine learning algorithms for classifying cancer. Moreover, earlier detection of the mutated tumor protein P53 gene can predict treatment and gene therapy techniques. Methods: (UMD-2010) the Universal Mutation Database is used to diagnose mutations in genes. The challenge, however, is that the database very basic. Besides, it is an excel format database. Due to its limitations, the data base cannot be used to classify cancer. In addition, bioinformatics techniques such as pairwise alignment and BLAST are used, followed by machine learning algorithms that use neural network algorithms to classify cancer based on malignant mutations in the TP53 gene, by selecting (12) out of (53) database fields for the TP53 gene database in the second stage. It should be noted that the (UMDCell-line2010) database does not have one of these twelve fields (Field of gene locus). Result: As a Utilizing MLP and SVM for training and testing a set number of fields, the Machin learning methods were found to be an effective way to classify cancers. Where the Relative Absolute Error for MLP and SVM is 83.6005 % ,65.6605 %, the accuracy is 90 %, 93.7% respectively. Conclusion: Following the learning and testing stages, the mean absolute error (MAE), used to measure the errors was found in the SVM less than the (MAE) in MLP algorithm. we can conclude that using SVM is considered better than the MLP algorithm because the accuracy in SVM better than the accuracy of MLP.

Artificial Intelligence in Health Sector of USA

“…AI algorithms are being developed to analyze medical images such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans, to detect and diagnose diseases (B. N. Mohammed et al, 2021)(Al-Hashimi et al, 2022. These algorithms can accurately detect abnormalities that may be missed by human radiologists.For example, in 2021, researchers at Stanford University developed an AI algorithm that can diagnose COVID-19 from chest X-rays with high accuracy (Munagala et al, 2022)(M. G. Galety, Al-Mukhtar, et al, 2022) (Kasasbeh, 2021) (Mikhail et al, 2022). The algorithm was trained on a dataset of more than 18,000 chest X-rays from 2,200 patients and achieved an accuracy of 84% in diagnosing COVID-19.…”

A comprehensive framework for advanced protein classification and function prediction using synergistic approaches: Integrating bispectral analysis, machine learning, and deep learning

“…Using sequence alignment, the most prevalent sequence-based method, conserved regions, insertions, and deletions in protein sequences are identified. ClustalW (a multiple-sequence alignment program) and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) are the most widely used alignment algorithms [ 8 ]. However, sequence-based methodologies have limitations, including the inability to identify distantly related proteins due to sequence divergence and the susceptibility to errors introduced by gaps and insertions.…”