2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative investigation into the influence of the constitutive model on the prediction of in-plane formability for Nakazima and Marciniak tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15 displays that the pressure correction causes a moderate variation of the data points that do not affect the global tendency given by the linear regressions. The obtained results are in good agreement with those reported in [24,33] in the case of the AA5182-O alloy and an advanced high strength steel. Finally, the correction method adopted in this work to obtain linear deformation paths up to failure is relevant for ultra-thin sheets, since the strain paths obtained in the Nakazima tests exhibited non-linear strain paths.…”
Section: Pressure Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 15 displays that the pressure correction causes a moderate variation of the data points that do not affect the global tendency given by the linear regressions. The obtained results are in good agreement with those reported in [24,33] in the case of the AA5182-O alloy and an advanced high strength steel. Finally, the correction method adopted in this work to obtain linear deformation paths up to failure is relevant for ultra-thin sheets, since the strain paths obtained in the Nakazima tests exhibited non-linear strain paths.…”
Section: Pressure Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This could be confirmed by microforming Marciniak tests [35], but these tests are generally performed on a much lower scale than this one (punch of 1.5 mm compared to 35 mm), which is likely to exacerbate other local and scale effects. The corrected FLCs for the pure Cu and CuBe2 alloy in Figure 15 are in good agreement with the results presented by Noder et al [33] for the study of the formability of an AA5182 alloy 1.55 mm thick and DP980, with a sheet thickness of 1.2 mm. These resulting FLCs may be considered as the true forming limits of the selected materials, for perfectly linear strain paths in the absence of normal pressure through the thickness.…”
Section: Pressure Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the results of photogrammetric measurements, the tool trajectory can be modified to ensure the desired uniform thinning of the sheet along the transverse profile of the ribs. An assessment of possible defects and failures is carried out on the basis of the location of the points corresponding to the actual material deformation in relation to the Forming Limit Curve (FLC) [ 49 , 50 ]. The FLC, as the key feature of the Forming Limit Diagram (FLD), records some pairs of in-plane limit strains (major and minor) and defines the boundary between the safe zone (no necking) and dangerous zone (necking and splitting), which is above the FLC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They calibrated their model experimentally and investigated the localized deformation. 31 Studies on the effect of texture have been fully developed by previous researchers, [32][33][34][35] but, at the best knowledge of the authors, the influence of grain geometry, their aspect ratio, and heterogeneity on FLD and stress-strain relation has not been investigated until now. In this article, considering the mentioned parameters on the tension behavior, the FLD of aluminum 2024 has been obtained by the finite element method using the crystal-plasticity model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%