2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative mechanical and bone remodelling study of all-ceramic posterior inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen loading forces represented moderate chewing occurring in daily life (Schindler et al, 1998). This sequence allowed for the calculation of increasing load cycles (first and third) and the repetition of a load cycle with the same force magnitude 1913;Field et al, 2012), which reduced the strain tensor to the equivalent strain. The applied loads for calculation of micro-gaps were 120 N, representing the upper boundary of chewing forces (Schindler et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen loading forces represented moderate chewing occurring in daily life (Schindler et al, 1998). This sequence allowed for the calculation of increasing load cycles (first and third) and the repetition of a load cycle with the same force magnitude 1913;Field et al, 2012), which reduced the strain tensor to the equivalent strain. The applied loads for calculation of micro-gaps were 120 N, representing the upper boundary of chewing forces (Schindler et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the materials involved in this study were considered to be isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. [46][47][48] The Young's modulus E, Poisson's ratio υ, and density ρ were defined for teeth, bones, ceramics (bridge), PDL, and titanium (implants), as summarized in Table 1. 48,49…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seramik inleyler, bukkal ve lingual duvarların sağlam olduğu Class II restorasyon gereken kavitelerde ve direkt posterior kompozit restorasyon yapıla-mayan durumlarda amalgam veya döküm metal restorasyonlara geçerli bir tedavi alternatifi sunmaktadır 5,10 . Düşük plak kontrolü ve çürük aktivitesi yüksek olan hastalarda seramik inley yapımı uygun değildir.…”
Section: Seramikunclassified