A comparative perspective on destination competitiveness through visitors' and stakeholders' perceptions in the region of Cappadocia

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the study is to contribute to the body of knowledge with a different and richer approach, by evaluating the competitiveness of the Cappadocia Region, which has a culture-oriented single or limited product variety, with a comparative and holistic approach from the perspective of visitors and stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachThis research, designed on the basis of the Cappadocia Region to make original and rich contributions to the literature on destination competitiveness, has the characteristics of a field study based on collecting and analyzing raw data through scales. For this purpose, research was conducted with 401 visitors and 277 tourism stakeholders. Data was analyzed using t-tests to compare two groups and the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare more than two groups. Cronbach's alpha analysis, nomological validity and a pilot test were conducted for validity and reliability. In addition, descriptive statistics and normality test were used in addition to the exploratory factor analyses.FindingsBecause of the research, it was seen that the competitiveness perceptions of the participants in the region differed and that the region has many strengths such as natural beauties, accommodation facilities and a positive image. However, it was determined that the competitiveness perceptions of visitors who have more touristic experiences in the region have increased in parallel with their touristic experiences. It was established that the competitiveness perceptions of the stakeholders who have comprehensive knowledge of the managerial problems and the destination competitiveness components of the region are generally lower than the visitors.Practical implicationsThis study provides some practical implications for touristic destinations based on the research area. In order for destinations to survive in a fierce competitive environment and strengthen their competitive position, it is very important to analyze and evaluate consumers' needs and requests correctly, reveal existing differences, and use resources effectively. In addition to strengthening the image of the destination and adopting a sustainable and innovative approach, the integrated tour programs that offer touristic activities in nearby cities can be diversified with nature and adventure activities.Originality/valueIt is seen that studies that have been conducted with a comparative and holistic approach with data obtained from both visitors and stakeholders are quite limited. In addition, most of these studies have been conducted on destinations that are widely preferred such as mass tourism but which are less competitive than alternative tourism examples. Therefore, this study has a broad perspective and strong implications for destination competitiveness.

A Framework for Assessing Wellness Tourism Destination Competitiveness: A Perspective From the Wellness Tourism Clusters in Thailand

“…Moreover, areas or tourist attractions that facilitate development, improvement and changes and the local area's appeal could encourage wellness tourists to visit. This finding was consistent with Akin et al (2021), who found that the destination's overall image, the expertise of staff in tourism and services and business expertise in providing wellness tourism services were important factors in promoting the destination, thereby improving competitiveness. Altinay and Kozak (2021), Armis and Kanegae (2021), Ferreira and Perks (2020) and Woyo and Slabbert (2021) emphasised the importance of tourists' personal safety and hygienic healthcare services at the destination.…”

“…Such areas should be outstanding and facilitate the development, improvement or changes pertaining to wellness tourism, including the local area's appeal, which could promote the destination to attract wellness tourists. This was consistent with studies by Akin et al (2021), Armis and Kanegae (2021), Bogale and Wondirad (2019), Ferreira and Perks (2020), Mustafa et al (2021) and Woyo and Slabbert (2021), who found an area with abundant natural resources, exquisite sceneries, human-made natural tourist attractions in harmony with the nature, outstanding architecture with unique local identity and variety of culture and tradition (Dos Anjos and Da Rosa, 2021;Goffi and Cucculelli, 2019;Hernández-Rojas et al, 2021;Wardana et al, 2019). Gajić et al (2018) and Petrović et al (2018) emphasised the preparation of adequate medical or wellness service facilities for tourists' needs, such as state-to-the-art equipment.…”

Destination competitiveness since 2010: research themes, approaches, and agenda

“…They found that good weather, nature-based activities and special events were considered the most important destination strengths by local companies, while hospitality/friendliness, safety and cleanliness were perceived as the top strengths by visitors. Akin et al (2021) also compared both approaches in the context of Cappadocia, Turkey. They found that all of the competitiveness factors (e.g.…”

Evaluating Gastronomic Destination Competitiveness through Upscale Gastronomy

“…To survive, thrive, and position themselves in an environment of fierce competition, destinations must know, understand, and satisfy their guests' needs and use their resources effectively [84]. Dwyer and Kim [77] adopted an approach to measure destination competitiveness based on Porter's diamond model [85] and Ritchie and Crouch's model [71].…”